The Moonshot program was the largest, organized effort by the U.S. government to find cancer cures. Congress voted it down.
Even though this would be a win for all Americans – and humanity – it apparently did not outweigh the politics of making a Democrat look good. This is the definition of party over country.
Republicans have stated budget cuts need to be made with an ever-growing debt. But where was this attitude when tax cuts for the wealthy were on the table in 2017? They don’t have to look at patients in the eye and break the devastating news that they have cancer. They don’t have to treat cancers that block intestines or drown a patient’s lungs in fluid.
Because the Bush family had always been close to the house of saud. Of which Bin Laden was a member. On September 11th before anything was even clear. They had gone through and evacuated every member of the House of saud from the US. The majority of the attackers being from Saudi Arabia and also funded by Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden was also trained and armed by his father and Ronald Reagan. Their history goes way back.
"You've got to read this," Fran Townsend remembers the president telling her. "He said, 'Look, this happens every 100 years. We need a national strategy.'"
Thus was born the nation's most comprehensive pandemic plan -- a playbook that included diagrams for a global early warning system, funding to develop new, rapid vaccine technology, and a robust national stockpile of critical supplies, such as face masks and ventilators, Townsend said.
Trump wants to disband most beneficial government agencies because it’s a win win for him. Fascists need enemies, and his corporate mistresses will benefit from deregulation
And we'll say it again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and....
As long as there is a population of ultra wealthy individuals there will always be an asshole party entirely dedicated to those people... :(
Sean Hannity: As usual the Demonrats are LYING about how our brave Congress stood up to the elites that were demanding that you give your hard earned tax money to democrat pharma companies! They aren't looking to cure cancer, they're LYING!
and every maga moron will believe it.
There is no true reality to be agreed upon when propaganda is allowed to run so rampant. I FULLY believe 1000000% that the BIGGEST problem we have is propaganda. Solve that and we can actually start making progress.
Nooooo, see, what you don't get is that they're all special! They're not dragging us to hell WITH them, since they all get a free pass and go straight to heaven. They're just dragging us to hell.
The stuff passed during Nixon's presidency was mostly not bad, because he had a progressive congress and knew it was good for his public image if he went along with their stuff (and took credit for their successes), but Nixon realized Southern Strategy, and his presidency perhaps marked the start of descent into incivility and absurdity in politics. He was a piece of shit in every regard imaginable, but he wasn't an obstructionist afaik.
Reagan is where policy took a SHARP dive, straight into the ground. He was the next step which was allowed by Nixon turning national politics into a rapid-fire shit-spewing competition.
Reagan led the charge but there was also folks like Gingrich and Armey doing stuff like the Contract with America (Heritage Foundation endorsed) and pushing to never let the dems have a win, and always oppose whatever they do.
I'm of the opinion that sunshine laws also fucked things up but that's a whole other discussion.
For a while now I've been pondering this very thing. I can't prove it conclusively, but I honestly think this goes all the way back.
$0.02: The USA was started as a bunch of colonies, and we're co-cohabiting with lunatics that think this still is one. Over time, territory expanded westward up to and through the Civil War. This was done by the kind of people that came to a foreign land, saw it was full of people already, and decided to completely upend that whole situation for their own benefit. You know, the whole "screw them, got mine" world outlook. This is also an ethos that is completely compatible (if not required) with owning people (slavery), secession to maintain that ability, spilling blood over it, and continuing to punch down on "people not like us" for a 150 years since losing that fight. In a sense, we're up against colonists, the values they espoused, their great-great-great-offspring, and people in their community that keep those values alive.
And when you FUCKING WON you did the thing I would never do. The South would have been a smoldering pit of cinders in my timeline. I'd have decorated the halls of the white house with the hides of the plantation owners.
You've learned nothing in all these years except how to be polite to the scum you beat until they inched their way back on top of you. It's truly one of the most vile tales in human history.
Cuba has faced more than 50 years of US sanctions. Now, for the first time, a unique drug developed on the communist island is being tested in New York state. But some American cancer patients are already taking it - by defying the embargo and flying to Havana for treatment.
Cuba, a country that the US has tried to destroy for over 60 years now with economic sanctions, has better healthcare than the US, aka the richest nation on the planet.
There is no excuse for the state of healthcare in the US. We really have some evil, greedy people deciding to let people die so they can have more money.
Also Cuba didn't really do anything? They only truly alligned themselves with the communist block after the united states decided to start being shitty to them out of nothing but paranoia. Classic tyrant looking everywhere for conspiracies and causing some to appear moment.
From now on, anyone who loses someone to cancer will not have to wonder what happened or how it could have been prevented. Death to cancer no longer has anonymity. The mask will forever be removed. We can now lay future loses and pain due to this horrible fate at the feet of Republicans and their partisan horseshit.
Fuck, I hate those fuckers, now as much as I hate cancer!
This has been the GQP party line for quite some time now, make the national debt only matter when they aren't the ruling party. It's their only way to look good, they know Democrats won't hold US citizens hostage so they can stuff bills with whatever they want and still get them passed because Democrats won't let US citizens suffer. Meanwhile all they do is just nuke legislation when they aren't in power because they couldn't care less. They don't appeal to the same voters, just those they can brainwash, and they hedge their bets so those voters matter more.
Also, ever notice how often things are attributed to "Congress" in headlines like this? I mean, given the mention of Biden you could infer that it's most likely the REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS, not "Congress", from the headline since it mentions blocking a win for Biden, but....still. Seems to happen a lot. It must be more about that "objective journalism" and the "balance", etc...
And it stands to benefit those Republican congressmen who run back to their jurisdictions and say "Washington isn't doing anything about your needs. Send me back and I'll obstruct them from doing the things that aren't helping you"
Not this time. Cancer isn't communicative and there is no one alive who has not known someone battling or lost from cancer. It's not a personal failing of the individual and it doesn't give a shit who you are or how you live. It just might be the first time that a Republican voter could tangibly see how the wealthy and Republicans look to keep them dead, rather than do something nonpartisan.
Fuck a "win for Joe." They just blocked a win for humanity. We all know that in the end, you bet your ass the wealthy will have no problem getting their hands on this no matter the price or extremes they have to go to as soon as they are personally affected.
Seriously, buy ads on every type of public media display possible. It could read:
F#k a win for Joe!*
Republicans in Congress just voted to let you and anyone you love die in the name of letting you and anyone you care about die from cancer!
Call your local representative and demand they put their partisanship aside, because I'm sick of seeing good people lose their lives to something that we now have the power to stop for the benefit of all of humanity!
I don't know. Maybe throw out shit about how even beloved pets get cancer and die even sooner than we expect because of this shit. Maybe show a picture of a sickly dog shining down from a glowing halo. I'm just spit-balling here. You all get it!
So what needs to happen, since we seem to let heads of state address Congress, is to have a mandatory session where cancer patients all come out, addressing their concerns directly.
Since it's apparently no longer enough to speak at the ballot box, thinking that the person you're voting for might actually have your good will in mind.
Let the patients speak. Show the room their pic lines. Let them explain about how shitty they feel most days and read names of those in their families who have died from the same cancer they're carrying now.
Let them say directly to those who put bias and politics first how disgusted they are with the men and women who are supposed to be the ones fighting for them. Not against them like it's some highschool pissing match.
It would work if these politicians had empathy, but they don't. Otherwise, the world wouldn't become the shithole that it is now and massive efforts would be put towards greenhouse gases reduction.
Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
Do you really think the CEOs of big pharma don't know they themselves have a 20% chance to die of cancer?
(Not to speak of their relatives).
Would the selfish and rich big pharma company leader not do everything to prevent its early death?
It's not like their effort would reduce that number to 0%. Id expect something more in line with a reduction from 20% to 18% at best.
And I have no problem believing that CEOs of huge corporations would give up a few percent of their chance to survive an eventual cancer to ensure that their wealth continues to grow greedily.
it's not american debt, but american loot and interference in other economies which holds the world hostage. No one would care for american debt if all countries were trading in their own currencies. Except, maybe, some if the americans themselves.
Unless you're spending all your money on cancer research, you can always spend more on it. At some point, you have to draw a line and someone will accuse you of deliberately refusing to cure cancer no matter where you draw that line. It's plausible to me that the line should be where the Democrats rather than the Republicans want it, and it's even plausible that Republicans are acting in bad faith. However, this article presents no evidence for either claim.
But $2.8B over ten years on an effort to improve health care treatments for one of the most deadly maladies in the US? My god! That's over 3% of our Ukraine military aid budget! We need to draw a line somewhere!
I think that's a pretty reasonable response. Maybe not so much that cancer in general is over funded but I'd be willing to bet a breast cancer cure probably isn't any closer now than it would be with another billion. It's definitely a bad look for the GOP though. I see a lot of We the people... bs bumper stickers with the f*** cancer! stickers.
Spending one billion on breast cancer drug discovery/ development would probably lead to one more drug which increases survival by 10-20%.
Or if spend on fundamental research it would lead to a lot of additional knowledge. Which might lead in about 10 years (and a few billions more) to a few drugs which increase survival a further 30-40 %.
Look, you either kill rats or kill people. I love animals, it's unfortunate we need to experiment on them, but it's also naive to think we can make progress without doing it. At best one could make an argument for death row inmates to be experimented on, but that would be quickly shut down as unethical and there wouldn't be enough anyway. There is no way around animal testing, we can only keep it to a minimum.
It doesn't seem like this program has anything to do with "curing" cancer. It's just about preventing, treating, and researching. It doesn't explicity mention animal testing on the whitehouse.gov page. I'd say its a program with good goals.