The answer is clearly yes, if this comic is anything to go by.

What's with the sensationalist headline? Trump is angry but there's no reason to think he's "panicking".

I don't think there have been any new discoveries about what composes a single subject since then.

(Note that the "single subject" rule has been in Nebraska's constitution since it was originally written in 1866.)

Trump's was lower at the end of his term than Biden's is now, but I'm not sure how relevant that is since it was after everyone knew that Trump had lost the election (and then after the January 6th riot).

Drow are 100% the BDSM fantasy of the D&D authors. That's why they're so popular.

Biden's approval rating is lower than Trump's is right now and lower than Trump's was at any time between this point during his presidency and the 2020 election, although it isn't lower than Trump's was at the lowest point during his presidency.

It's also lower than Nixon's or GWB's were at any point during their first terms (although GWB isn't a useful reference due to 9/11).

Maybe, but my understanding is that it's legal to have photos of someone actually being the victim of a sex crime, not just photos of consensual acts.

I thought that was DEX not INT.

Yeah but I don't think you were considering voting for Trump... I think that in practice associating her with an unpopular president's actions isn't a bad idea when her main selling point is that she isn't either Biden or Trump.

Even the people in the USA at the time generally just read about this in the news without getting involved. The fraction of the population that was either protesting or attacking the protesters was small.

Even the people in the USA at the time generally just read about this in the news without getting involved. The fraction of the population that was either protesting or attacking the protesters was small.

Consider something like the controversy around gay marriage, which more people here might remember. Most people might have picked a side the way that they would support one sports team over another, but they didn't have strong feelings about the issue and they didn't actually take any action.

Thanks. So photorealistic paintings are still legal, although I suppose they're not a big problem in practice. It's still weird that the method of creation matters, although "any other technological means" is pretty broad. Are paintbrushes a technology? Does using a digital camera to photograph a painting count as creating a visual depiction?

I'm vaguely worried about the first-amendment implications.

distribute, or receive the deepfake pornography

Does this make deepfake pornography more restricted than real sexual images either created or publicly released without consent?

I was going to ask the same thing. Is a hand-drawn picture illegal?

How much IQ do I need to buy before I get telekinesis?

85 I am here

100

200 Telekinesis

300 Mind control

Conan the Barbarian was not a good movie, and I say that although I love Arnold. (I know it made him famous, but still.)

What the hell did we do to the turkeys to make them grow to that size in two months? (I probably don't want to know.)

you will depend on someone else’s kids

don’t complain about picking up some of the burden to raise them

I don't think the latter follows from the former. There are going to be plenty of people here in the future even if childless Americans don't subsidize Americans with children. That's the great thing about America - we can just let in the best among the many millions of people who want to come here from other countries. Accepting a young adult who is already educated and ready to do productive work seems like a pretty good deal compared to investing money into a child who won't be productive for twenty years.

(Both the "accept no immigrants" and the "accept all immigrants" sides are wasting such a valuable opportunity!)

I would vote for a vampire, mummy, or other deathless creature.

Maybe media could do their job and posit what that word might be.

I think that's also not a winning argument. Again, many voters who are hostile to the idea of DEI still don’t want to think of themselves as explicitly racist. If the Republicans are acting racist, these voters won't support them. But if the Democrats are calling these voters racist, then these voters won't support them either.