Man oh man, do I hope the Harris campaign embraces this trolling-the-troll tactic, and that it makes an impact with enough of the bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe dumb-as-a-rock crowd.
I wish it mattered. I wish facts and functional debate mattered more than racism, bigotry, and fear of others. People who vote for him do so not because of his ability in discourse.
I wish politics didn't get reduced to "he/she was good on the teevee" level or below that.
In 2016, I remember Hillary being perfectly rational and clear during the debates. Yet I also remember reaction photos from across the country, people not even listening to the words being spoken, just squirming at the sight of Clinton, poisoned by decades of negative propaganda against her, utterly oblivious just how viscerally they had been manipulated by right-wing media's hatred towards "this... this... uppity librul woman".
They didn't listen to a single goddamned word being spoken by anyone. They might as well been watching a silent .gif as far as they were concerned. Such informed voters, so savvy! bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe!
And Harris seems to know how dimwitted those viewers are, hence the vibe check campaign. You don't need to comprehend words to see Trump squirm and her laughing it off. I hope that plan works!
The people who vote for him don't read, they barely understand segments on TV - they understand the big picture from sound bites and short videos. The debates just broke Trump into the worst possible clips imaginable and will definitely trickle into the feeds of some ardent followers who will question why their man looked stupid when usually he looks so smart. It will show the deplorables their leader IS that dumb.
Until last night, I thought sometimes Trump was being maybe 1% strategic by behaving like one of these goofballs that votes for him. After watching him debate with the moderators using "I SAW IT ON TV" as an argument, I think he is one of them.
More specifically: he is furious that he was humiliated by a woman.
Because humiliating women is part of his imminent being, thus his status quo has been challenged, and he fuckin' hates that someone beneath him doesn't "know their place."
She established control with the forced handshake and introducing herself. Which I don't think she planned, but she saw the opportunity and jumped all over it. I almost expected him to turn away and run off, it rattled him.
I believe that was 100% planned, she knew perfectly well going in he wouldn't meet her in the middle and instead asserted the situation. He didn't shake hands with Clinton or Biden - I thought it was a great way to show him she's different.
She should take the opportunity to debate an empty podium. (Mostly kidding, because when Eastwood "debated" an empty chair, he just seemed senile and silly.)
But I do think the country needs to see Tim Walz give a good schooling to JD Vance.
I think the country seeing more of those two would really sway votes the way I'd prefer. So I'm biased.
But gov Walz represents as very genuine and honest and caring, and the more we can see some of that on our TVs the more we can believe that a most-good-soonest kind of administration is an option.
Look. They could lose. Or Harris and Walz could be faking, even if I don't think so (or want to think so). Or gopnik fearmongering could be right and they could only be barely better than a Dump/Chance ticket.
Just give us this. We haven't had positivity and hope since prez Obama and the hope of Change[TM].
Now, as I haven't suggested everyone boycott for one particular single issue or another, I expect downvotes right to hell. So be it.
She should take the opportunity to debate an empty podium. (Mostly kidding, because when Eastwood "debated" an empty chair, he just seemed senile and silly.)
A whole debate with that would be silly. She could turn it into a town hall style discussion and run commercials with her debating and "waiting" on donald. He could be scared somewhere with a blankie.
Look at the debate from the start. His slow ass could barely make it to his podium before she was their to shake his hand. She was fast, confident, and looked strong to me. Donald looked like he was huffing to the stage.
The interviews with independents worry me. The Times was saying they complained about not getting enough specifics from Harris.
Which is infurating being how handwavy Trump's whole platform is. For example, I have no idea how he intends to get sub $2 gas being the last time it happened the price of crude was literally negative.
Conventional knowledge is that it's in Harris's advantage to not give him another chance, even though she'd probably trounce him. He's mostly just afraid of her after being bullied back effectively for the first time on stage.
I cried laughing when he took the rally size bait. It's a shame we won't get more of that, lol
She invited the American public to watch one of his weird rallies and watch how his small crowds leave early due to exhaustion and boredom.
He could not help himself and refused to answer the next debate question spending all of his time talking about how big his rallies were, how Harris’ rallies were small and fake.
He ended it with, and I have to preface this with the fact that this is a real thing that happened and not hyperbole I’m using for comedic effect, talking about some unhinged and completely baseless conspiracy about immigrants stealing and eating peoples pets.
Not that I don't believe this - Snell is a laywer and commentator seen on MSNBC and NPR - but I would like to see more than a screenshot of a tweet about it.
Former President Trump told "Fox and Friends" Wednesday morning that he is "less inclined" to participate in another debate against Vice President Kamala Harris before the election
The behaviour is also consistent with someone who knows they lost and expects to lose hard again if there's a rematch. Maybe even more so if he had the impression he was holding his own while it was going and then saw what everyone else was saying after the fact.
Trump can read a room and change his positions accordingly; he knows banning abortion is unpopular, so he frames it as "Well actually I'm why all those states had referendum's protecting women's healthcare", which is is true, in the same way Rosa Park's bus driver played a role in the Montgomery Bus Boycott.
He was scared of her already. When they entered the stage he was intimidated. Go wash somebody reviewing body language and they'll show you bit by bit just how bad it was. The part where he refused to even look at her no matter what his circumstances? Yeah he was terrified and no idea of how to process it.
Ok, you know what Harris should do instead then? Do a live AMA on fox with real viewer questions. Seeing those numbers Trump wouldn't be able to restrain himself from demanding another debate. And this time it'll start with an announcer going "round two, fight!" and not end before "finish him!"
Why should she be afraid of critical questions? Besides baiting Trump, Harris would also show that she will be the president of the entire country, not just the people who voted for her. I may have paraphrased that bit from the west wing, but it does have some merit.
If american politics should be less polarized, then you can't have a third of the citizens feeling left out. What good can come from dismissing the topics that Trump's voters feel are important? Make them feel seen and make them feel heard. No, you probably can't reach the rally going nuts, but if people only voted for Trump, if they'd been to a rally, then he wouldn't be an issue.
Honestly, Kamala didn't have to say anything. It was all "trump v trump" for a little while there which was worth seeing and has been the crown jewel of very debate digest. All that needed to happen was for moderators to call bullshit on his hyperbole and fabrication in real time.
Why, though? His supporters will believe anything he says. Is something going to magically snap them out of their hypnosis? Will somebody actually say, "yeah, I think Trump, who raped a 13-year-old and can't spell out the truth for shit, is someone I want for president!"? I know she "defeated" him in the debate, but what will change?
A handful of moderate conservatives who might have voted Trump will be disillusioned with his cowardice and not bother voting at all. This is a motivate/demotivate election, not a change minds election.
It familiarizes Americans with her and hopefully gets people off the couch to vote. Trump is working with limited numbers, if there's a great turnout, she wins.
Under normal circumstances, the debates would help highlight each candidate's approach to varying topics to help people better understand who they want to vote for.
Trump's intentional unwillingness to abide by the debate rule makes it little more than a middle school kids insult match.
My main concern is if they have another one, Kamala might get cocky and say something that backfires and then the press will run with it like the Howard Dean scream. Quit while you’re ahead and don’t gamble away your lead. It’s not worth it.