Luigi Mangione? I haven't heard that name since he saved my life, here in North Carolina, same day as that United Healthcare guy keeled over from a heart attack
No, can't be. At that time I saw him singlehandedly organizing the "Save The Puppies" program, where he would stand on top of a bridge and as some psycho drove by with a sack full of puppies to throw over he would dive bare chested into the cold, cold water and swim the puppies back to shore stacked on top of his head.
What about the CEO? I heard he broke his neck trying to suck his own cock.
I'm not sure what your point is. That's why there's a trial. A murder trial. To decide if he's guilty. Nothing in the story claims otherwise. In fact, they go out of their way to point out that he has only been accused, not convicted.
Exactly. The mediaâand people as a wholeâneed to stop automatically assuming he's the killer. Even those who support him are still acting like he's the one who did it. What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
People generally don't have time to whittle words about their attackers profession onto bullet casings in a shootout, and fabricating untraceable firearms generally isn't something rich people do for self defence.
Yes, but who has the time to do that when they're playing Battletech at the same time as the murder? Which he totally was with me at that exact moment.
That's merely your understanding of self defence.
Other people like those in the jury may have a different understanding - and their understanding is more important here.
That the wellbeing of the majority should be more important than the wealth of a few. And that the situation is currently so skewed that it's not surprising people are rising up against it.
I'm just waiting for someone to decide that "Mario Party" is a good codeword for "conspiracy to murder the wealthy." After all, it's a group activity where someone plays Luigi.
They've already ruined one woman's life in Florida as example for daring to invoke Luigi on a phone conversation with her "healthcare provider" who was in the midst of denying her coverage.
Epstein had blackmail, and as such was still a danger to the rich, even in jail. On the other hand, Luigi was just some guy with a gun who got lucky, if they can lock him up for the rest of his life, he doesn't pose any danger.
I fear that we're witnessing a concerted conditioning aimed at ensuring the suspension of habeus corpus. At this point, it seems to be a bipartisan theatrical effort. I reallllllly hope I'm just being paranoid because if I'm right, we have no concept of the hell that awaits us (I'm writing this from a quantum decryption proof VPN)
300k+ to work one of the most famous cases in the nation? You bet your ass lawyers are looking at that. No matter the outcome youâre a legend. You canât buy that kind of PR/marketing.
This guy is going to spend decades in prison unless he starts running for president.
People are advertising jury nullification, but that won't clear him for the same reason that a McDonald's employee would tell the cops where to find him.
My fear is he's going to be used to instigate the social unrest needed for project 2025 to reach it's goal of suspension of habeus corpus by June 30th. That's end game and the way they're concentrating messaging against the judicial branch right now means they're grinding toward the 6 month milestone right on schedule.
The fact the most famous dems aren't saying the above is chilling.
What if we all got too comfy with our rights and values during lockdown and the tree is about to be shaken so violently that we'll all be thankful for a low wage job in a few years? I guarantee that's a bipartisan goal.
There could be a legitimate conspiracy, for sure, but the Dems aren't manufacturing this hell. The Dems wanted to tax the rich and socialize healthcare, we've just never believed them enough to give them the power.