And also impossible because the Republicanazis would never allow it.

Making your brain do exactly what it's supposed to do is a weird way is "tricking" it.

It calls for the preservation of an in-group by the extermination of an out-group.

I said this:

Fascists deserve fascism, but they deserve to be the victims of it.

You're twisting my words and making fallacious arguments. This conversation is over. Feel free to write another novela, but I'm done reading.

That would be relevant if it was a weapon.

I see the competition to be first against the wall is heating up.

Do you see the Coke can as a different color from the background?

Hard disagree. You're making an invalid slippery slope argument. Eliminating fascists is self-defense. Eliminating other groups is not and therefore not comparable. The problem with fascists isn't that they kill people; it's that they systematically target out groups for elimination without regard to whether they are dangerous—and in fact they tend to target the least dangerous people first.

Also now that I think about it, eliminating fascists was your idea. I think that if they were to be eliminated, they would deserve it, but I wasn't actually advocating it. What they need is to be kept far away from any kind of power or influence.

It can be great, but a lot of states have literally no standards for how it's done, and most (all?) of the rest have very weak standards. I'd be fine with it if there were real standards requiring parents to educate their kids and not brainwash them into being Nazis.

If we manage to have any more non-sham elections.

Compared to Trump? Yes, very much so.

I'm pretty sure their actual justification is that turning the United States into a dictatorship will really own the libs.

There is no supreme court, just a fascist cabal in robes.

Read more carefully:

The president can issue executive orders pursuant to a grant of discretion from Congress, or under the inherent powers that office holds to deal with certain matters which have the force of law.

Executive orders are limited to exercising powers already granted to the President by Congress or the Constitution. The President cannot just make up new laws. This is basic stuff that should have been explained to you numerous times if you're American.

If I'm gonna be eaten by a robot I'd much rather be dead first.

Something something paradox of tolerance.

Why should we listen to you and not Sotomayor?

How would he "illegally introduce a new law"? He could issue a decree but it would be meaningless because nothing gives a president the power to make laws.

Not if they've been forcibly removed from office.

Christ you're obnoxious.

Fascists deserve fascism, but they deserve to be the victims of it.