Wait until she finds out about daemons.
Or the rituals I hold in my server room to appease the Omnissiah
My atheist configuration doesn't allow me to believe in daemons: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10022442/37361421-26026212-26f3-11e8-8e97-d5136bce5e41.gif
It's always funny naming a function which removes a child object from a parent object. I've stuck with "abandon child" so far.
Just rename the child to Hamas. IDF will kill it for you.
Garbage collection??????
/s
SendToBoardingSchool()-- |Removes the given object from its current parent, if any, and then adds it as a child of the other given object. kidnap :: ChildBearing c p => p -- ^The kidnapper. -> c -- ^The child to kidnap. IO ()def callCps()
Theoretically, where would one find a child to sacrifice? Asking for a friend.
Inb4 normies force us to change well established terminology just to appease their fragile souls
Like git's main and master
Whining about that change is kinda a red flag ngl
Look, we already got rid of "Master/Slave" in favor of things like "Parent/Child", "Active/Standby", or "Primary/Secondary". We're not making more changes because right-wingers are afraid of everything.
do we still have mother and daughterboards?
tbh i think "master" terminology is only bad if paired with "slave". the word itself kinda just lost it's original meaning
but I don't really care about git's change. im only using master out of habit"Okay Todd, looks like Steve is working on auth, so you'll be on the blacklist today-... ahah I mean, working on the blacklist today ahem..."
Oh yeah that was a shitshow. I made a point to keep "master" in my repos and configurations because it's the other meaning of master - one of the many others. Words are allowed to mean different things, ya know? If I'm drinking some coke I'm certainly not drugging myself (...I hope).
After all, the command to attach to a master is not "git slave", it's "git pull".
The child must be sacrificed to appease the daemon.
I smell a crime thriller where a serial killer is a programmer and hid their actual child killing searches by masking them as programmer endorsed child killing kind.
Surprised she didn't freak out with the line below. It's already gone on a killing spree...
Understandable because it's the process that's getting killed, but no child being sacrificed yet.
I'm surprised she managed to read five of the words.
I like how at the start of the line it explicitly says "out of memory" but we're just pretending this is some satanic bullshit.
She obviously read the error to find "kill process" and "sacrifice child" but still ignored the memory error
What? How does her being weirded out about the words "sacrifice child" mean she ignored anything? It doesn't matter what triggered the error, she is questioning why the code has dark word combinations
Who TF is still using CentOS?
People who don't have cents?
giggle
People who still have an i686 CPU, apparently.
What if you're a TV ?
Just wait until she learns child processes get aborted
When sacrificing the child, use a dagger made from obsidian. Cut upward from below the sternum, then force the rib cage apart. Push the lungs aside with your hands, then cut out the heart with your ritual dagger. Hold the heart up to the cheering crowd, and then place it in an earthen vessel in honor of the gods. Kick the body down the steps of the temple pyramid.
This ritual is common, but it has a bug in it that can be traced back to a specific SacrificeOverflow comment.
That's what happens when you use a knife shaped in a crescent moon.
Actually no. A transsternal access to the heart is impossible with stone tools, even obsidian. Middle american ritual sacrifices were performed transphrenic – they had less problems with the complications of that access as they didn't intend their victim to survive, in contrast to — most — modern surgeons.
Yes, I made the ritual description up for a joke. I've never performed a human sacrifice.
While most people on Lemmy are going to know what this means, the person who wrote this error message was definitely trying to be cute with that phrasing.
So my first role as a developer I’m working on an application that runs various classes for children, the parents sign up but it’s children they’re booking for.
We use reactstrap and there is a package called buttonasync and it has a method of executingChildren, let’s say I was a little confused.
return ( <Form onSubmit={onSubmit}> <FormGroup> <Label htmlFor="name">Name</Label> <Input type="text" name="name" placeholder="Name" value={props.name} /> </FormGroup> <ButtonAsync type="submit" color="primary" isExecuting={isSaving} executingChildren={<><FontAwesomeIcon icon="spinner" spin /> Saving...</>}> <FontAwesomeIcon icon="save" /> Save </ButtonAsync> </Form>
THE BELOW MESSAGE
That's not how adjective order works.
Please disregard the next message.
Please disregard the above message.
Please disregard the below message.
Please disregard the following message.
Please disregard the last message.
It's nonstandard but gets the point across. English isn't a programming language.
Yet?
"It is not even wrong" - Wolfgang Pauli
She just wants to save the trees!!
Meh.
