That means they support Hannah Montana Linux
And most likely Beibian too!
And uwuntu!
Or my favourite, PonyOS.
Side note, isn't TempleOS not Linux based?
Seems like the creator (forget his name) had some beef with Linus Torvalds and was originally trying to build something to get away from his software, no?
Edit: yeah, based on the Wikipedia Page, it looks like its not based on the Linux Kernel. Also dev's name was Terry Davis.
No, it's not. I'm making fun of NordVPN for calling it one.
He made it because his schizophrenia made him believe that god told him to make an OS. It's quite a sad story. ):
thou shalt not use any software written by that rude Finnish man
- God, apparently
The glowies want you to think it is Linux based
Terry was a Linux user btw. He used Ubuntu on his streams.
As a linux user you should know that all VPN companies are as trustworthy as a chronic liar, and therefore not rely on one. So it doesn't matter that they don't support Arch, really. And even good that they don't support Tails.
Arch users, by definition, roll their own Wireguard networks
Of course, I need to access my two different networks from anywhere anyway. And then I can also force all traffic through random proxies.
K so what should I be doing instead
Just use mullvad
Probably TOR.
I hear I2P had a lot of potential, but also a lot of issues. Haven't checked up on that project in a bit. I know it was a BITCH to set up when I tried plinking with it some years ago.
So TOR (despite the latency/speed issues and its own security concerns) is still probably about as good as it gets.
For most people, using https and dns over https (DoH) is probably all that's needed.
It say TailOS, not Tails though.
Hosting vpn in cloud is the way to go, I guess?
The fuck is "TailOS"
Also what about
- Gentoo
- Alpine
- NixOS
Just to name a few
NordVPN is full of garbage. Use Mullvad, IVPN, Incognet or Tailscale instead
TailOS is what happens when someone gets the for browser and decides to make it a full distro (and also make the distro only run from USB)
Yeah that's called "Tails" not TailOS. And it's a pretty great tool.
Yeah that would be tails and it is an entire distro lol not just a browser
Not especially secure though
Did you forget BedRock ?
no arch support, why? arch is a major distro
it just means they can't help you, if you have an issue. of course you can still connect to their VPN.
It's probably in the AUR. It's just unsupported.
IDK why they are listing distros. They could just provide a wireguard config and be like "If you have wireguard, you can use the VPN", and 99% of distros would be supported.
It's in the AUR. One can also PKGBUILD and install via pacman manually.
I use Nord on arch daily, works really well.
btw nord vpn is a scam. Has poor security and mines your data. Look what i found on the dark web. Your data might be there
Best I remember from the doc I watched, TempleOS doesn't even have a network stack.
ok but nobody uses arch
yeah most people prefer arch btw
big claim ; small distro
BTW I just installed it on my new computer…
i use manjaro, which is an Arch derivative.
Manjaro is pretty popular. and the AUR is the tits
you don't have to be ashamed that you use templeos
Make a list about which distro is included, not which not.. Else you would have a never ending test process..
I can understand TailOS, as it works with TOR. TempleOS is a strange thing from the start, but Arch?
We must hold these sinners to account, this is the percicution that God warned us about! We must defend the Temple at all costs!
I support Arch, but I will refuse the business of anyone who would choose to install Arch on their machine.
Why?
