So their proof is that ancient Chinese dragon depictions look like dinosaurs? Well, no shit Sherlock. Ancient people find a huge dinosaur skull fossil, of course they start making up dragons.
They claim that all Chinese pottery was built wrong. The article says (sic) "If you Photoshop the handles to reverse the head, it looks like a Triceratops instead of a classic Chinese dragon."
Seriously. The evidence they claim is that if you digitally alter the photo, it looks like a dinosaur.
“If we digitally alter this thing then if you squint really hard and take these lead supplements for a few months then it maybe kinda looks like something else!”
It's funny how about twenty years ago creationism was a big deal on the internet, but now the creationists are still doing their thing but the internet doesn't care anymore.
Creationists handily lost that argument, because it's so obviously wrong and deeply unpopular. They've since moved on to issues they think are more exploitable, eg dehumanizing trans folk
I could never understand how believers refused to believe in evolution. Even if you believe in an all-Knowing, all-powerful deity, why would you want to believe they wouldn't use all the tools at their disposal?
Having evolution at your disposal and still manually creating every living thing would be like using a pencil and paper to sum the columns in an Excel spreadsheet.
In other words, if you believe in God and don't believe in evolution, you believe in a dipshit god. Your God probably failed out of deity school.
It's because that would contradict a literal interpretation of the Bible (not all Christians subscribe to a completely literal interpretation of the Bible, but most creationists do).
Fun fact: The Catholic Church, of all things, officially says the 'let the earth bring forth' bit of one of the bible's two creation stories is a poetic way to reference evolution.
So true, and society back then used wireless devices to communicate, as we neither found copper nor fiber optic cables. And dinosaurs (or humans back then) were time trallelers, as almost no dinosaur or human was found in the same ground layers. See? Evidence, lotsa evidence!
I'm not easily finding this piece of art online. Is it some Han dynasty vase with a dragon on it and the Creation museum has gone Full It's a Dinosaur They Lived Among?
The Dinosaur Bones are Fake Crowd has fallen off in recent years, they were most prominent from the 1860s to the 1980s when the fossil record was less complete and reliable than it is today. They used to cite Charle's Darwin quotes about lacking evidence religiously, quite ironically. They are always looking for some new quotes from evolutionary biologists today like Mark Ridley quoted saying we lacked enough transition fossils in 1981 but since then he's already renounced that argument and brought attention to the many new transition fossils found since then such as tiktaalik.
The problem with Dinosaur Bones are Fake arguments is that the people who make the arguments know nothing of fossils because in the process of learning about fossils they realize they were wrong. Sometimes I see a stray "Carbon Dating only goes back 50,000 years reliable and doesn't work on surface exposed objects" as if radiology would only work on specific carbon isotopes lmao.
But if humans and dinosaurs lived together, then where are the dinosaurs now? Doesn't this theory imply "things are as they always have been", therefore God?