yes but if Spotify uses its own GenAI music, they don't have to pay anyone else when someone listens to it.

Spotify's plans to take money from subscribers but never pay a fucking dime to anyone else , ever.

I love that they have Ultima 4 available for free. I spent SO many hours in that world. The "what kind of person are you" value judgment questions at the beginning were remarkably heavy for introspective teenage me.

fucking WebEx

(movie trailer music starts) in a world... where online commenters... don't read articles... ONE HERO... challenges EVERYONE... to do the unTHINKable.... (movie trailer music stops)

How night and day work above the Arctic Circle.

Movies and TV and stories talk about how there's 6 months of daylight and 6 months of darkness. That does not fucking happen. This is still part of storytelling to this day (I'm looking at you, Sweet Tooth season 3).

Days get stupidly long in the summer, and there's a while where the sun really doesn't go down. in the Winter days get stupidly short, and there's a while where it doesn't really come up all that much. But it's not 6 months of one and 6 months of the other.

(edited for clarity)

yeah but a script that sucks the balls of an executive is far more likely to be greenlit.

It’s great for parsing through the enshittified journalism.

It's ironic that GenAI is great for solving a problem it caused. It's like hiring a gangster to take you through gangster-controlled territory.

I think this speaks more to the usefulness of performance reports than the usefulness of GenAI

hug3b00b5

During the Iraq War, there was a brief moment where a camera crew just happened to be in the right place at the right time to show the world a live broadcast of a perfectly healthy Saddam Hussein out in the wild, being greeted by his troops as a hero. Except the guy really didn't look much like Saddam Hussein at all. It was the kind of cheap fake that you would think people could never fall for.

Since then, we've seen time and time again what people will fall for.

So, yes. Not only are you correct, you are probably more correct than people would want to admit.

because of Stockholm Syndrome

FTA

Industry groups argued that those museums didn’t have “appropriate safeguards” to prevent users from distributing the games once they had them in hand. They also argued that there’s a “substantial market” for older or classic games, and a new, free library to access games would “jeopardize” this market. Perlmutter agreed with the industry groups.

So as long as someone, somewhere, might make a penny off of them, they can't be free. Insert your own metaphor here.

aw man that site was like Dr Bronner's took some digital mushrooms

it was written in FORTRAN

I guess these are those "the best people" that we've heard mentioned so many times.

yeah and my ex-boyfriend "intends" to pay me back the $3500 I loaned him to fix his car.

Right.

Even the news is in re-runs.

Funny how they use the phrase "with it's data" when it's our data.

Equally funny how there's no mention of how users who no longer have active accounts are supposed to tell Xitter that they don't want to share what they entered. Musk has openly flaunted law before (even to its own employees), so it's pretty silly for people to think that they would abide by what users choose in the first place.

it looks like there's a light-blue-on-white strip visualizer over the timeline at the bottom.