Just buy the two books "What They Teach You at Harvard Business School" & "What They Don't Teach You at Harvard Business School" and that should cover the entire fucking universe.
Someone once tried to achieve enlightenment with just the second book, but it turns out the familial relationship between the soul and the mind is covered in an elective course.
"If you're looking for self-help, why would you read a book written by somebody else? That's not self-help... that's help. There's no such thing as self-help. If you did it yourself you didn't need help. Try to pay attention to the language we've all agreed on. "
yes, you do it yoursef, but you always need some external inputs and inspiration before you try something new. and where you get that inspiration and what you try matters a lot.
you're joking, but "choice paralysis" is a real thing and actually makes people feel worse about their choices than if they had fewer options to choose from
I get the joke, and certainly not all self-help books are good, but also people are unique and at different places in their lives. With just a little introspection one can probably tell which book would be better for them. Maybe they say yes too much and would benefit from learning how and when to say no; or they say no to everything and would benefit from learning to embrace new experiences.
Or, you know, pick one up and thumb through a few pages.
Hmm I should make a book titled "everything in moderation". It'll be 500 pages long, and take every single self improvement be-all-end-all solution to whatever problem, and tell you "no, there is no single solution that magically solves every complex issues". Nothing fancier, just that, over and over, for hundreds of pages.
The point of a teacher is to challenge the student. We become wiser by putting knowledge to the test, not by merely ingesting information. There is as much misinformation as there is true information, if not more. That is why learning is only complete once the misinformation is separated from the true information. And the only way to do that is to experience the information in the context of the real world.
This is just as true for machine learning/AI BTW.
Interestingly, each and every title portrayed here is, individually a lie, and collectively probably more accurate. Because the truth is usually much more nuanced and complicated than can be distilled into a short book title. But you won't get that by reading a single book or author. And while reading multiple authors is closer to getting to the truth, the real truth is found when you put the books in context with your own experiences and reality.
That's not an excuse for climate denial though. A teacher will rightfully tell you your world view is too small to experience climate change.