UPDATE! Now 30% of Lemmy Apps display posts accurately
Updated! Updates are shown in quote text like this. Some scores are updated following app updates.
An Apps Experiment
Introduction
This is an experiment I performed out of curiosity, and I have a few big disclaimers at the bottom. Basically, I've seen a lot of comments recently about one app or another not displaying something right. Lemmy has been around for a while now and can no longer be considered an experimental platform.
Lemmy and the apps that people use to access the platform have become an important part of people’s lives. Whether you are checking the app weekly or daily, and whether you use it to stay up on the news or to stay connected to your hobby, it’s important that it works. I hope that this helps people to see the extent of the challenge, and encourages developers to improve their apps, too.
How I did it
I wanted to investigate objectively how accurately each app displays text of posts and comments using the standard Lemmy markdown. Markdown is a standard part of the Lemmy platform, but not all apps handle it the same. It is basically what gives text useful formatting.
I used the latest release of each app, but did not include pre-releases. I only included apps that have released an update in the last 6 months, which should include most apps in active development. I was unable to test iOS-exclusive apps, so they are not included either. In all, 16 apps met the inclusion criteria.
I also added Eternity, which is in active development, although it has not had a recent update. I was able to include several iOS apps thanks to testing from @[email protected] – Thanks, Jordan! This made for 20 apps that were tested.
Each app was rated in 5 categories: Text, Format, Spoilers, Links, and Images. I chose these mostly based on the wonderful Markdown Guide from @[email protected]ity, which was posted about a year ago in [email protected]ity (here).
I checked whether each app correctly displayed each category, then took the overall average. Each category was weighted equally. Text includes italic, bold, strong, strikethrough, superscript, and subscript. Format includes block quotes, lists, code (block and inline), tables, and dividers. Spoilers includes display of hidden, expandable spoilers. Links includes external links, username links, and community links. Images included embedded images, image references, and inline images.
Thanks to input from others, I also added a test to see if lemmy hyperlinks opened in-app. There was a problem with using the SFFA Community Guide that caused some apps to be essentially penalized twice because there was formatting inside formatting, so I created this TEST POST to more clearly and fairly measure each app.
In each case, I checked whether the display was correct based on the rules for Lemmy Markdown, and consistent with the author’s intent. In cases where the app recognized the tag correctly but did not display it accurately, that was treated as a fail.
Results
Out of a possible perfect 10, 7 apps displayed all markdown correctly:
Lemmy apps devs work very hard, and invest a lot in the platform. Lemmy is better because they are doing the work that they do. Like, a LOT better. Everyone who uses the platform has to access it through one app or another. Apps are the face of the entire platform. Whether an app is a FOSS passion project, underwritten by a grant, or generating income through sales or ads, no one is getting rich by making their app. It is for the benefit of the community.
This is not meant to be a rating of the quality or functionality of any app. An app may have a high rating here but be missing other features that users want, or users may love an app that has a lower rating. This is just about how well apps handle markdown.
This is pretty unscientific
You’ll see my methodology above. I’m not a scientist. There is probably a much better way to do this, and I probably have biases in terms of how I went about it. I think it’s interesting and probably has some valuable information. If you think it’s interesting, let me know. If you think of a better way, PM me and I’d be happy to share what I have so you don’t have to start from scratch.
My only goal is to help the community
I do think that accurately displaying markdown should be a standard expectation of a finished app. I hope that devs use this as an opportunity to shore up the areas that are lagging, and that they have a set of standards to aim for.
I don’t have any Apple things
Sorry. This is just Android and Web review. If someone would like to see how iOS apps are doing, please reach out and I’ll share how we can work together to include them.
I used reddit is fun exclusively. Once I figured out compact post size, I was sold. It has every functionality and a great UI and it hardly ever barfs. And it has a Dracula theme for dark mode. Brilliant. Seamless.
Visually I like Thunder quite a bit, but it's still fairly early in their development so it doesn't have feature parity yet.
Voyager, while stylistically not my favorite, is the most performant and usable out of any of the apps I've tried. It's what I use most often (though I still have a ton of Lemmy apps installed and occasionally switch around on a new release to try them out).
Relay and Sync were my preferred Reddit apps, Relay probably got the longest use for me, though Sync was the last I used regularly before the API shenanigans.
Hello! I'm the dev of Summit. Do you remember what Summit failed on? I would be very interested so I can fix it (seems like it failed maybe one or two things I'm guessing?)
Thank you - I'm not sure if I replied to you individually. I had a couple requests to post more details, which are here: https://lemmy.world/comment/11514952
Quiblr should now have each of the markdown criteria fixed. Thank you for the feedback and for your diligence in digging into the markdown and promoting a more consistent Lemmy experience across apps.
Edit: Looks like I missed the "opening link in-app". This should be updated now!
Thanks for doing those tests. I'm honestly surprised Tes scored as high as it did considering I switched markdown renderers several versions ago and knowingly left a few things unsupported.
The one I'm using uses Github style markdown, and I've had to add some shims to that to support Lemmy's flavor. Overall, it's much easier to work with (and extend) than markdown-it, but, on the downside, I had to accept that sub- and superscript wouldn't be supported at all. There's also some annoying default behaviors that cannot easily be overridden.
I'm planning at some point to fork and patch that to address those limitations as well as add some more fine-grained control over the default linkificaiton ( e.g. so usernames without the @ prefix won't be linked as mailto: email addresses). Hopefully those will be accepted upstream, but if not, I'll probably maintain it for my own purposes.
A number of apps struggled with treating usernames as mailto links. Another thing I came across that was not tested here was how some apps fail to render tags inside of other tags.
If so, I didn't even think to handle those (or recall ever seeing them in the wild). lol. I did think to break out comma-delimited words inside a tag and treat them as separate tags.
If you have a list handy for each of the apps, it could be easier to share it with devs and have them look into it. For example, I know Boost doesn't handle spoiler links, which makes using [email protected] a little dicey until I've already solved them.
I also wish that Lemmy had a nicer spoiler syntax in general. I'd prefer something like code formatting to support both inline and block spoilers.
Example:
I can't believe the real culprit was the butler.
I was suspicious when the character was sneaking around, but I didn't think he would go so far as to steal the pets.
Spoilers on Lemmy are pretty quirky to be sure. It's really a collapsible menu. I think it would be nice if the devs created true spoilers like you describe. It would also be nice if you could nest spoilers inside of other spoilers to create a multi-layer menu.
I'm not really holding out for either one, I just think it would be nice.
Lemmios - Link opens in app. Everything looks and works great EXCEPT Spoilers.
Mlem - Link opens in browser, not app. Manually went to test post. As with Lemmios, everything looks and works great EXCEPT spoilers.
Remmel - Instant fail. No development in 2 years, unable to even add an instance or an account. Non-starter.
Thunder - Hard to test. Lots of lag for some reason. Link opens in browser, not app. Manually went to test post. That being said, EVERYTHING worked. The lag may have been because I had just linked my account. Testing everything above, then coming back to Thunder, I found it fast and responsive.
Voyager - Link opens in app. EVERYTHING worked. No notes.
So, ranking them:
Voyager - EVERYTHING worked. No notes.
Thunder - Everything worked, but laggy to start with when using a year old account with lots of data. Once it caught up, everything was fine. Would probably be great with a new account.
Lemmios - Link opens in app by default. Spoilers don't work.
Mlem - Link opens in browser by default but is user configurable. Spoilers don't work.
Arctic - A few minor failures.
Avelon - A few more failures than Arctic.
Bean - Hey, it works better than Remmel. Probably abandoned.
Do you have more info on how you calculated your scores?
Interesting that you rank the official Lemmy website as not displaying correctly. I would have thought this would be the baseline. Did you use Jerboa as the baseline?
I describe the specific things I looked at in the post. It is based on the standard of CommonMark.org, with the lemmy-specific changes: expandable spoilers, user links, and community links. the Lemmy-UI does not link usernames for some reason. It does detect when you are typing a username and auto-format it into a link through a dialogue: @[email protected] but it does not detect and link usernames typed in plain text: @[email protected]
Hmm that site seems down at the moment but I was asking more for specific things that led to specific scores for each.
Interesting that it gets a mark down for the username thing. But there must be more. Summit gets a 9.7 and you said each category was weighted the same.
I'm curious if users get notified if you tag them without the full link. That would be a back end action not handled by the app/UI.
If not, you could argue that Lemmy-UI is more correct since apps that do the link might give the impression the user has been properly tagged and notified.
Surprised to see Boost that low in the rankings. Literally the only issue I'm aware of is the spoiler syntax isn't supported. I've always considered it much more solid in the way it feels compared to the other apps. I think I've used most of them.
I was not joking about this not being an indication of overall quality. My favorite apps are lower on this list but have other great features! I hope to have a better resource in the future to provide App reviews for different features.
Spoilers are pretty important though. That's one or like to see in every app.
Gotcha. Like some other users, I'm quite curious to see the details of how you arrived at these scores. The spoiler thing can be important, but for some reason it doesn't bother me personally all that much. I'm very curious if there are other rendering issues with Boost outside of that one.
Thanks for the testing! I'm the dev of Interstellar and looked through the list to try to see what I need to improve, but I believe everything you mentioned in the post already renders correctly. Would you be able to give the specific results you found (on what doesn't work) from your testing?
For reference, I viewed the Lemmy Markdown Formatting Guide you linked, and everything seemed to be working fine on the app.
Looks like they tested with username links as well that I do not see in the formatting guidelines but cuased the lemmy-ui to be the same score as your application, so that'd be my educated guess.
Jerboa user checking in. My biggest gripes with it are:
not always showing me that I have things in my inbox when refreshing my feed
links from a post to another post seem to render in my default browser (Firefox) vs Jerboa
every once in a while gbord's spell check stops working. I haven't experienced this in other apps, so.. maybe something is going on here?
Everything else is pretty solid though. The only nice to have feature would be saving draft replies locally automatically. Reddit is fun did that and spoiled me. Nothing is worse than starting a long reply, life getting in the way, coming back to Lemmy, and being greeted b my refreshed feed.
Your other post on this same topic, with a cross post to this one, renders this way when I clicked the cross post link:
I checked it out after posting, but I had to go back and forth between threads to find and compare the apps tested. I feel that it would have been easier to check out the apps if there were links directly in your rankings.
Images included embedded images, image references, and inline images.
Did you test anything like gif, mp4, etc.? I have no idea if it is an official feature or whatever, but I have noticed that only some clients support it
No, but I have a plan to do a more comprehensive test of features people are interested in. Right now, it can be tricky for users to know which apps have which features unless they try them all. It would be nice to have a resource that compares apps at a glance, although I'm not quite sure what that looks like just yet.
From the image above, it looks like the subscript did not render (and the superscript did not terminate correctly, although that would not be a deduction). The two separate quotes were rendered as one continuous block. This image doesn't show the table, but on my device the table does not render the correct column alignment. Maybe you can show me what you mean?
Hi. Did you include spoliers in preview as part of the test? I mean, some apps show a preview of the post when you are scrolling the feed, before opening a post, so my question is if the tests included checking that post with a spolier is hidden both on the preview and when opening the post.
I don't ultimately understand why the creator decided that this review of markdown accuracy was too much for the app to bear. I don't know why the creator decided to create a post saying that it was the "worst Lemmy app" - half an hour after I informed them that I made an error in the initial review and then corrected it. I don't know why the creator decided to remove their app and source after many of their loyal users - including myself - pleaded with them no to. The dev offered several different reasons, some of which were conflicting. However, I respect their decision. They are an adult and a professional. It is their work and their name on the project.
Thankfully, the code was rescued by another user before being taken down, so any dev who wishes to continue the work is free to do so. I would happily welcome it!
As I personally told the dev multiple times over the past months, it was an excellent app, and my personal daily driver. I am as disappointed as anyone that one user's opinion about one aspect of an app was the "last straw" that led to the developer's decision to pull the app.
I am heartened that several other devs have reached out to to thank me for raising this issue, and are working to close these gaps. I believe that a rising tide raises all ships and I hope for all apps to improve. I hope that the original dev will return or another programmer will be willing to carry on the legacy of the app so that it can rise as well.
Unfortunately there was some error in the first version of the benchmark and the app's score was 4.1.
The project was tightly tied to personal information about the dev, so he feared to be affected on his real life after negative comments started being posted.
The last post on the community told that either a fork would continue or he would republish everything under a different GitHub account.
A fork has indeed committed to continue his work and it has a couple of knowledgeable people working on it already, so it looks like nothing is lost. Plus the leaderboard has been amended 😉
It's not OP's fault that Raccoon's developer chose to be extra and delete their app from the internet for scoring low on a Markdown implementation rating, especially since the level of implementation was a design decision. Further, a pull request was coming soon that would have dramatically improved it. It's too bad that the developer being dramatic killed off a very nice app.
This isn't kindergarten, if your application can't stand up to scrutiny, and objective, no personal attack review, then your team wasn't ready for the real world
It was not your fault either. The dev made a decision. Many of the App devs saw this post and commented, and some have already made updates to their app.