The power is out and my laptop has less than 10% battery left?
It's pacman -Syu time.
Exactly my thoughts as well.
Why update on that little battery life left... the power will return sooner or later, going without updates even for a week or two is no real problem. Hell, I update like once every 3 weeks to a month, it's not that big of a deal.
I update always after a session, meaning about once a month 😂I don’t really need my PC, lol
Wait if the power is out, how do they have Internet to load new packages? Something doesn't make sense here
It first downloads all packages from net, then it proceed totally offline starting by verifying downloaded files, signatures, extracting new packages and finally rebuilding initramfs.
Because arch is replacing the kernel and inittamfs in-place there is a chance that it will not boot if interrupted.
This issue was long resolved on other distro.
One way to mitigate it is by having multiple kernels (like LTS or hardened) that you can always pick in grub if the main one fail.
Cellular data
I don't think I've had a pacman update take longer than 10 minutes before. Sounds like OP was updating all their AUR packages too.
Still absolutely a terrible thing to do on 10% battery life. I bet there's an AUR package for "check battery level before update" out there somewhere though.
OPs meme is "use distro whose model is 'give users enough rope to hang themselves' " and complaining he's at the gallows
I imagine being at the gallows sucks even if you know why you are standing there
What about a desktop PC?
shutdown a computer when you shouldn’t computer breaks
how could a computer do this
Why would Arch do this?
Pacman is very fast. The tradeoff is that it isn't as "thoughtful" when it runs. It doesn't have the same protections as apt or dnf. I especially like dnf as you can undo any operation.
Power outages do happen, and I'm pretty sure 90% of the people on this community are not using an UPS.
Given enough users and enough time, it's inevitable that a power outage will happen to some people at an inopportune moment, like while updating an important package like the kernel.
Blaming the user for this is not fair, it's just dumb bad luck.
That said, OP could have done a bit more to fix the issue instead of being an angry man yelling at the cloud. When you're using Arch, the expectation is that you are able to fix relatively simple problems like this, or that you're at least willing to learn it. If you find yourself getting angry when Arch doesn't hold your hand, you probably shouldn't have chosen Arch.
I think I didn't make it clear enough: My laptop was on the power during the update process, when the power randomly cut out - for the first time in about 6 years, it doesn't happen often. Of course you can interpret it as user error - but I think it's reasonable to update my system when plugged into, normally reliable power. The laptop battery is pretty much dead, so it would've shut itself down automatically anyway.
sure, but what os wouldn't break if you did this?
If it was on something like BTRFS it'd probably be fine, though I imagine there's still a small window where the FS could flush while the file is being written.
renameat2has the EXCHANGE flag to atomically switch 2 files, so if arch maintainers want to fix it they could do- Write to temporary file
- Fsync temporary file
- Renameat2 EXCHANGE temporary and target
- Fsync directory (optional, since a background flush would still be atomic, just might take some time)
I still don't get the problem. Are you complaining you have to chroot into your system and finish the update because your power got interrupted? Is a 5 min detour into a live system making you unconfortable? This is how you would fix it in any distro except the image based ones and the arch wiki will guide you excellently how to do it. Good luck!
I mean any which way you try to frame this, saying that you won’t use Arch anymore because you didn’t take the precautions necessary based on your situation is gonna take some heat here.
What precaution would you expect OP to would've done though? A fallback kernel would be my guess - that's something many casual oriented distro do out of the box basically. . I read your post as "you're right, don't use arch" - something btw which I tend to agree with although I wouldn't say that's because of the precautions.
I use arch because there's no black box magic. For an end user who expects or wants that... Yes, arch might not be the right choice.
I don't really get why you couldn't pick one of your other installed kernels and boot that, but you seem pretty intent on blaming arch and I don't feel like trying to troubleshoot it, so that's that I guess.
How dead are we talking here? Even on an older laptop a kernel update doesn't take that long. Should have just kept it going, hoping for the best.
I am using an old laptop that gives me 3 minutes to run from one power plug to the other before just going out.
- Boot to usb
- Mount your root filesystem
arch-chrootyour mounted root filesystem- mount
/boot mkinitcpio -p linux
Steps 1,2 and 3 are the entry way to solve all "unbootable Arch" problems by the way, presuming you know what needs to be changed to fix it of course.
I'd gladly take an Arch wiki article
For a while, I had to do this after every kernel update
Turns out, i accidentally had two
/bootfolders. One was is own partition, and the other was on the rootfs partition. When Arch booted, the separate partition was mounted over the rootfs/bootdir, "shadowing" itExcept, UEFI / GRUB was still pointing to the rootfs partition. So when pacman installed a kernel update, it wasn't able to update the kernel that UEFI was booting, but it was able to update the kernel modules
Kernel no likey when kernel modules are newer than the kernel itself
Out of curiosity: Which operating system(s) can you shutdown while the kernel is being overwritten? I wouldn't imagine that as a limitation of Arch Linux specifically.
I think fedora would survive this abuse. It doesn't replace when you install kernels, but instead adds it.
Arch Linux with 2 kernels ;)
Mint definitely keeps a couple of previous kernels around, so that might be a Debian and Ubuntu thing too.
That said, there's always going to be a critical point of failure that a power loss could cause things to break, no matter your OS or distro.
Writing the bootloader or updating a partition table for example.
Anything running on a copy-on-write filesystem can trivially rollback changes using a rescue partition.
I also expect most immutable distros would be able to be especially good at tanking this.
I assume NixOs would just let you load a previous working configuration if the current one got corrupted (though in this case it probably could simply rebuild the current one).
Windows
Goes back to a previous restore point
I haven't used Windows since Win7 - Is it possible nowadays to immediately cancel a kernel-level upgrade (say, Win7 to Win8) and have it gracefully stop and then boot into the pre-upgrade environment? If so, then Windows has come a long way. We use to be careful breathing-too-loudly around Windows computers during the upgrade process. Microsoft must be getting better.
If you're planning for this type of failure, what you probably want instead is Aurora from the Universal Blue project. Since it's fedora silverblue underneath, your OS either updates all at once or doesn't.
"Arch is stable"
It is! My Desktop hardly ever topples over!
So I'm trying to understand if you think that shutting down an update during regenerating the initramfs indicates that Arch isn't stable? Because that's a FAFO move and would crater any non-atomic update distro.
It doesn't ruin Debian or Fedora as they do the bootloader last
If it is interrupted it just boots the old kernel
When talking about Linux, "stable" usually means "doesn't have major changes often", or in other words, "doesn't have lots of updates that break stuff". That's why "Debian stable" is called that. Arch is not that.
Stable does not mean it's for everybody. My installation runs since now 10 years.
(The only other distribution this failsafe I know of is Debian)
I have LTS and zen kernels installed in addition to the default Arch one, that should prevent this yes?
I'm not sure - I had zen and the default kernel and both were inaccessible
This is why you keep a backup kernel
Ive been here. U can use a bootable usb to boot. Then use switch root to change to ur actual filesystem (I'm glossing over a lot of complications here ask chatgpt) and update from here or just copy over the kernal.
When I used Arch I updated once and it removed the running kernel and its modules. So when I plugged in a webcam it didn't work, since the module was gone.
Not a catastrophe, but it was an off-putting user experience coming from Debian. Arch felt more like a desktop OS, Debian feels more like a server OS to me (updates generally warn/confirm when you need to restart services or the machine).
To each their own! Having more up to date stuff was a nice perk of running Arch, certainly.
Debian and Fedora are solid on the desktop
Oh I love Debian on the desktop! More a comment on the feeling of the OS being very concerned about downtime and stability, with minimal "surprises." Not a bad thing at all!
This got me looking to see if there is any way to have a fallback as I have had something similar happen to me.
The general advice is to have a liveboot USB around. I even saw that you can have GRUB simply boot from an .iso file on the internal drives, which eliminates the need to keep a USB stick around.
I haven't followed the steps yet but I'll give this a shot because it intrigues me.
https://www.linuxbabe.com/desktop-linux/boot-from-iso-files-using-grub2-boot-loader
Or you could just install NixOS for update rollbacks (or use zfs/btrfs and set an alias to take snapshots whenever you update)
I always have a separate huge kernel on hand that boots without an initrd.
I was installing Nobara 40 and discovered that the live session is allowed to suspend the PC during the install process. The system ended up having problems with some basic functions...
That's why UPS boxes exist .. Or Timeshift if you don't have the cash
Image says "laptop". op could have just charge the battery a but before running the update.
If the laptop is upgrading the kernel so slowly it shuts down in the middle of a power outage it's probably old as hell and has barely any battery to charge.
In a comment he clarified that the laptop was plugged in and there was a power failure. Regardless, chrooting in should be a fairly straightforward fix.
shutdown
'shut down', here. 'Shutdown' is a noun missing a hyphen.
shutdown is a command, so op is technically right.
Oh no, a non-english speaker did something that could barely be called a spelling mistake! I'm so sorry for writing "shutdown" instead of "shut down". 🙏
Commas go inside quotes sir.
They don't have to. In fact, it makes more sense for them to be out the quote, unless they're part of the quote. Many writers use commas outside of the enclosement of the quotation marks. I do
MFW I say more than "L2S" and get downvoted by projectors.
