In an interview with Joe Rogan, Donald Trump praised Chinese President Xi Jinping as "a brilliant guy."
Former President Donald Trump heaped praise on authoritarian Chinese President Xi Jinping during a lengthy interview Friday with the podcaster Joe Rogan.
“We’re dealing with the smartest people,” Trump said, referring to the leaders of U.S. adversaries, about an hour and a half into their conversation.
“They hate when I say, you know, when the press — when I called President Xi, [the press] said, ‘Well, he called President Xi brilliant.’ Well, he’s a brilliant guy. He controls 1.4 billion people with an iron fist. I mean, he’s a brilliant guy, whether you like it or not. And they go crazy.”
They don't need to be paid to be ignorant. A lot of people don't understand nuance or how the American political system works and it shows in those threads.
I'm honestly still skeptical of that, It seems to me like Lemmy would be too small to be an efficient use of a paid shill's time, vs having them go to a mainstream social media platform. I think they're either genuine in intent but have twisted themselves into a completely counterproductive idea of what to do out of anger at how things in the world have gone, or in some cases are people trolling for a position they don't support, but who are doing it for free to advance their own position rather than for a paycheck.
This the fucking world my dad wants us to live in. He begged me tonight to please vote Trump he going save us.
Wonder what my dad would think about this? He hates China says Trump hates China and will make them pay with tariffs. I tried to explain that we pay those not China but it wss like talking to a brike wall.
My dad's the same way, he hasn't pleaded with me about my vote but that may only be because I don't talk to him.
Have you seen "The Brainwashing of My Dad"? I think that's what it's called, a friend recommended it to me and I need to make some time for it, sounds like it covers the impact of garbage like fox news on old men
The idea behind tariffs is to increase the prices of imports so that domestic production can compete. Higher prices are definitely the point, but the idea is that at least with domestic production the price increases get circulated back into the domestic economy as jobs/wages. But, if the domestic economy can increase production without increasing wage expenditure then the money from the higher prices just goes to the shareholders.
If it's something for which there is no domestic production, it's just a tax, and it should become a question of what does money from the tariffs get used for... probably taxcuts for the rich.
This is the 100% the "how did the other Germans, who weren't nazis, just let it all happen?" period. Gives you a bit more empathy for just how helpless those people must have felt and how complex those developing emotions must have been.
Yes, that's the complexity I'm talking about. The fact that you have time to post on Lemmy, as I do, and aren't setting something on fire, knocking on doors, etc. right now is the point. But we're in it now, make no mistake, this is that developing moment, this is the time it can be reversed, if ever. We're either lazy, or feel like we have too much relative comfort/friends/career standing to lose to be loud and active right now. But this is that moment, we are the frog in the pot. We'll never realize it's actually possible until the day after, because we need to hold on to the hope that it's actually impossible for it to happen again, but it is possible.
You speaking with confidence here it's also a way for you to personally calm yourself and reaffirm that same "actually, it will never happen" mentality. That's "them" not "us".
As with anything, there's a spectrum and plenty of the complicit German citizens were all too ready to drop to their knees early - the "anticipatory obedience" that bezos and the LATimes billionaire just demonstrated by not endorsing a candidate. Some of us will always stay quietly defiant, until enough of our comfort is taken away and we're left with no choice but to be active. But this is definitely a "flood the streets to denounce the steady rise of fascism" moment, and the streets aren't full, and you and I are both inside right now.
I'm not claiming a moral high ground, or providing forgiveness for bootlickers - I'm speaking to a place in the middle, where capitalism has worked very hard to make us comfortable enough, docile consumers. I include myself, because it's all fucking hard, and society is engineered so we can find our minor reliefs, while never forgetting about the looming absolute failure waiting for you if you get off the treadmill for too long. Where your life will peel away from you in layers, until you're left cold in the streets while pandemics rage, atmospheric rivers pour, heat domes wait around the corner and it's illegal to sleep outside and the shelters (built by the private prison companies) are all full.
Don't be afraid to talk out loud about this reality we share right now, fascism is on the rise throughout the whole world now. Russia is the instigator, US is the theater and the whole world is given permission as more is tolerated here. We can feel some shame and some anger, that's okay. Maybe it will motivate us or hopefully, maybe it will piss off the younger kids with less "stuff" and comfort amassed to lose. I was that kid, quick to jump into a dangerous crowd with a cause, with lines of tactical swat cops surrounding major intersections/freeways we occupied. I was able to do that then, because it was my decision, but my decisions are attached to other people now and, again, there's just more complexity.
To be fair the tankies agree with this opinion. There's plenty of other stuff they should disagree with, but this is in total agreement with their beliefs.
Not trying to be a dick (though I guess it kind of happened anyway), but maybe part of the issue here is that people are referencing cartoons instead of actual would history, when talking about the imminent threat of an autocratic ruler.
I bet the superior Yi Ping Ping Pong doesn't rape minors in China. That doesn't mean I want his ass telling me what to do. Fuck that Winnie the Pooh wannabe bitch. But it means, he's not Trump. But to be fair, Pooh probably orders lots of people's executions per month. Trump orders McDonald's. So there's that difference too.
Wiki: reliable - A 2020 RfC found HuffPost staff writers fairly reliable for factual reporting on non-political topics, but notes that they may give prominence to topics that support their political bias and less prominence to, or omit, things that contradict it. HuffPost's reliability has increased since 2012; articles before 2012 are less reliable and should be treated with more caution. HuffPost uses clickbait headlines to attract attention to its articles, thus the body text of any HuffPost article is considered more reliable than its headline. See also: HuffPost (politics), HuffPost contributors. Wiki: mixed - In the 2020 RfC, there was no consensus on HuffPost staff writers' reliability for political topics. The community considers HuffPost openly biased on American politics. There is no consensus on its reliability for international politics. See also: HuffPost (excluding politics), HuffPost contributors. Wiki: unreliable - Until 2018, the U.S. edition of HuffPost published content written by contributors with near-zero editorial oversight. These contributors generally did not have a reputation for fact-checking, and most editors consider them highly variable in quality. Editors show consensus for treating HuffPost contributor articles as self-published sources, unless the article was written by a subject-matter expert. In 2018, HuffPost discontinued its contributor platform, but old contributor articles are still online. Check the byline to determine whether an article is written by a staff member or a "Contributor" (also referred to as an "Editorial Partner"). See also: HuffPost (excluding politics), HuffPost (politics).
MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America