Communists? Nah, not a problem. I mean I'm a Star Trek fan, and while it's not played up that much the Federation is a post-scarcity socialist-adjacent society. I'm all for everyone having their basic needs met without condition or obligation, and money being obsolete.
Tankies though can fuck right off. North Korea is not a bastion of democracy. China is not more free than the US. This is not a comparison even worth entertaining.
Exactly, the tankies make me not want to talk about/positively about communist theory. I've always aligned more with socialist ideas but wasn't opposed to the idea of communism. The tankies make me just cringe when someone brings up communism now. It's like all the edgelords who have no real world experiences have gather together under the tanky flag.
Look, I know the Federation doesn't have money, but they probably brought it back just to charge Riker for all the extra cleanup required every time he visited the holodeck.
Communism =/= leftism. It's an extreme form of socialism.
My biggest problem isn't even the communist ideals. Have your ideas, that's fine. I don't care.
My problem is the amount of people coming into post comments attacking American Imperialism® on posts that aren't even related to communist ideals or, sometimes, that don't even mention America. It gets tiring reading how much America sucks when that's not even the point of the post.
Communism is leftist, and often conservatives and some liberals will call anything left of center "communist" so it's well within reason for the OC to be wary of your rhetoric.
Also disliking imperalism isn't only a communist thing, and I have to wonder what kinds of posts you're looking at that people bring up American imperialism if it's not relevant. I'm subscribed to a lot of political communities on Lemmy and don't see the topic of imperialism being brought up that often.
There are many types of communism. Most left leaning ideologies can be described in terms of communism. As Westerners, the further you live from Eastern Europe the more miseducated we tend to be about the subject.
This kind of false reduces the diversity economic ideologies into basically just "left" vs "right". Even amongst leftist ideologies, there's communism, democratic socialism, syndicalism, market socialism, and probably a bunch more.
The most common way to categorize economic ideologies I've seen is along the lines of who owns which means of production: land (including natural resources), labor, and capital.
Socialists generally want social ownership of land and capital, and sometimes labor (depends on which socialist you ask).
Capitalists generally want private ownership of land, labor, and capital.
Georgists (like myself) want social ownership of land, but private ownership of labor and capital.
But even those don't reveal the complexity of how to implement social ownership of thing, or degrees of ownership. Income taxes, for instance, are a form of partial social ownership of labor, something both capitalists and many socialists on paper oppose.
Market socialists want a market economy but with worker-owned coops.
State socialists want direct state ownership.
Georgists want social ownership of land through hefty land value, externality, and severance taxes.
But even that ignores the why of the various ideologies and their proposed policies.
Syndicalists want to achieve greater equity through unions everywhere and in every industry because they believe the power of collective bargaining will level the negotiating power between employer and employees
Market socialists want a market economy full of worker-owned coops because they see markets as an incredibly powerful tool, and because they see worker-owned coops as a very robust and equitable form of enterprise within a market economy.
Georgists want to tax land and externalities and finite natural resources (as well as lower barriers to entry for free enterprise) because we believe rent-seeking and monopolism to be the source of rampant inequality, and that a truly fair and competitive market without market failure is the best engine for shared prosperity
Genuine capitalists think the inequality is simply the unavoidable price to pay for all the prosperity, and that inequality itself is a motivator to be productive
And of course not all people hold their economic ideologies for noble reasons. Plenty of (if not most) self-described capitalists hold those beliefs either out of greed (because they're greedy rent-seekers whose land/externalities/natural resource rents ought be taxed away imo) or complacency (they don't like upsetting the status quo). There are also tankies who believe in communism not because they truly want a fair and equitable society that respects human rights but because they're just a fascist reactionary who likes to feel morally superior to others. I'm sure there are also some market socialists or Georgists or syndicalists as well who hold their beliefs for non-noble reasons.
But anyhoo, all that to say there's a tremendous complexity to economic ideology, and I think it's best to not frame everything as simple left vs right, black vs white, us vs them.
I don't mind seeing communist content, it's better than the shit that I was seeing on Reddit's front page before I left it. At least communists aren't spewing hatred against people based on their skin colour, sexual orientation, gender identity, or other things that people can't control.
Although the centrists and leftists still hate each other, Lemmy is just a nicer place in general due to the lack of far-right horse shit.
I dont have a problem with commies bc they are people that want good but we just disagree on how it should be achieved. Tankies on the other hand are basically nazis but they support stalin and not hitler.
I'm always surprised by people complaining about seeing communities they don't want to see. Does everyone really browse "all"?! Why don't people just browse "subscribed" and only subscribe to communities they like?
Community search function sucks, so browsing all is really the only viable solution to find new communities.
Also often you can find communities you didn't even think to search for in all, which is probably the most important function on lemmy as long as it lacks so many of the niche communities which thrived on reddit.
While tankie ideology is heavily flawed, they aren't bigots. while many deny or unknowingly support genocide, at least it isn't out of a hatred for the victims
I'm a socialist. This is just some more red scare bullshit. Just because I'm socialist doesn't mean I'm a tankie licking Russia's and China's boots. I'm an EU citizen, full on EU supporter, and at the same time I can be a socialist.
this is how I feel about the liberals to be honest, but that's the beauty of lemmy: we can have our instance to talk about communism, and you can have your instance to talk about how much you hate communism.
"I know we're the dominant group in everyday society, and most regular people agree with us, which means most people you must interact with on the daily are probably liberal, but we live rent free in your head you see, and it totally doesn't have anything to do with us shoving our bullshit down your throats every day in your daily life. It's because you're pathetic!"
The problem isn't communism per se, but communism forcibly imposed.
More precisely, the problem is that communism is the superior system to the degree that it's egalitarian - that it eliminates the ruling class and instead treats all citizens equally - and the forcible imposition of communism immediately destroys that, since it presumes that those carrying out the forcible imposition rightfully possess the authority to do so, and thereby simply establishes them as a new ruling class.
Communism should be the goal, but in order to actually fulfill its potential, it MUST be voluntarily adopted by the people rather than forcibly imposed.
This but also humans are inherently greedy, easy to corrupt, and prone to power hungry authoritarianism, so no system we create to govern ourselves has ever, or will ever, be fair or just.
I'm not sure how to implement it, but I'd like to see a qualified lottery-based election in which power is briefly thrust upon competent citizens selected at random. Because you're 100% right that positions of power attract greed and corruption. I think that the best people to put in power are the people who understand the responsibility to the point that they don't want it, and if they're only in power for a very brief time then it shouldn't be very corrupting or special.
Imagine jury duty but for political office, complete with a limited voir dire function to weed out people who are grossly unfit. That's the closest to fair and just that I can think of. It's just hard to get there without already having somebody in charge who doesn't really want to be in charge lol.
You might want to move instances. .ml is federated with hexbear, which has a lot of really annoying authoritarian communists. (Tankies) .world and many others are defederated with them, so you could block the subs and users, or move to a different instance.
My good bitch the door is open, this isnt an airport. You are not required to announce your departure. Please, by all means, fuck off.
I hear Reddit is a great place for scum sucking soulless capitalists. You should be a huge fan of all the shit spez is doing. Its great. He's destroying the platform to make money! Isnt that fucking amazing! Holy Reagan's blessed banana isnt that awesome!?