Star Wars is Fantasy to Star Trek’s SciFi, IMO. These genres get lumped together in libraries and publishing, and there is significant crossover between them, but they are still distinct.
George Lucas always said he hates it when people call Star Wars SciFi as he always considered it to be a space opera with very little Sci and heavy on the Fi.
I think the distinction is a focus of drama vs action. Star Trek is mostly drama with a Sci Fi dressing and Start Wars is more action with a Sci Fi dressing. Neither are really based on science and both have magical space transportation that lets them move between planets.
They are both great examples of doing what they set out to do, and why I am not a fan of the newer Star Trek movies and shows that try to be closer to the epic fantasy action of Star Wars. Just let them be their own things!
I've never really agreed with this. In the scale of sci-fi softness, they're both in about the same territory. Star wars is slightly softer because of Jedis, but star trek has empaths for example.
The main difference is that star trek tends to do a bit more of speculation about tech, and star wars is more about telling stories about fascism in space, but both do both at times.
While I love the meme pic, in all honesty I've always liked both of them in a way that both baseball and football are two very distinct sports that you can like both of as well.
As a child, I was heavy into Star Wars and always meh on Star Trek. As an adult, I'm still heavy into Star Wars, but I have warmed significantly to Star Trek and really enjoy it now. I think I just didn't fully understand Star Trek as a child. They're very different, but both are great.