It'll go great with our party's purple tiefling

28 comments

Canon is wrong, dragonborn have tails
- the official canon states that tieflings can't be purple, and yet the official artwork for a tiefling is a purple tiefling
  
  Possibly the most ignored sentence in the PHB, even by Wotc themselves:
  
  Their skin tones cover the full range of human coloration, but also include various shades of red.
  
  Official Dragonborn PHB description say Dragonborns are brown/rust coloured, with some being rust-copper green.
  
  Artwork on the same page is a red scaled dragonborn.
This was settled years ago
- TROGDOR THE BURNINATOR!
So they just have a scaly butt? I'm picturing a crocodile walking around except that instead of a tail it has butt cheeks like a human.
Another image I can hear thanks to Bill Wurtz.
I recognize that the council has made a decision, but given that it's a stupid-ass decision i've elected to ignore it.
Speaking as a person playing a soot-black tiefling...
This is the real reason I stopped playing D&D. The OGL stuff was just a smoke screen.
Why are Japan and Korea the same color on this map? 🤨
- It's a screen cap from a video talking about Japan's involvement in World War 2, where they invaded Korea.
  
  https://youtu.be/xuCn8ux2gbs
  
  The video for those who are curious. Absolutely worth the 20 minutes.
You want a tail, play a Kobold!
Erm, tails are based, ofc my pc has one!

28 comments