it might be that school fucking sucks and makes kids feel gray inside
whereas weekends leave them free to experience actual joy
It's this or kittens, there's an ad for flygresor.se where it's literally just a bunch of shots of kittens wearing knitted airplane costumes while a woman sings "flyg flyg flyg, flygresor.se".
that is what actually competent commercial design looks like, you've immediately grabbed my full attention and planted a jingle in my memory that will never leave.
as a västgöte i take deep offense to this, it's perfectly normal to say something is sketagôtt
one is a word, the other is a word with a descriptor in front of it. like greenhouse vs green house, one means a building made of glass where you grow stuff, the other is a house painted the colour green.
i mean there's silverlök, which is a very white-looking onion..
garlic is amazing until the point where it curbstomps me with a migraine
I shudder to imagine how much nutritional yeast you'd need to consume to gain weight..
taste-wise butter is like, slightly better? but the price is so hilariously not fucking worth it in the least.
Plus, you can get margarine with added omega 3! As someone who fucking hates fish, that's pretty nice.
maybe maybe not, but for sure it's not the thing you should be worrying about, what you should be worrying about is eating less in general, eating more vegetables, eating less carbs, and getting more exercise.
it's just solid canola oil and water lmao, do you just eat spoonfuls of it on its own? i mean i guess butter would be better to consume like that but not by much..
as has already been said, overmorrow is already mostly a thing and is completely cromulent, and i propose taking the swedish "förrgår" and bringing it in as something like "foremorrow" which sounds reasonably cromulent to my ear, might confuse people a little bit but the "fore" bit is a pretty big hint as to what it means.
and yet a nuclear bomb is commonly referred to as "nuke" and no one bats an eye, curious
are you asking why english should be taught in non-english native countries, or in anglophone countries? Because the former should hopefully be obvious, being able to understand and use english is pretty useful these days..
The latter, teaching languages to people who already know them, is something i'm more iffy about.
I think it's dumb to make it mandatory, instead we should have optional general linguistics courses and encourage people to read.
Maybe as part of history class you can learn about how your native language was spoken in the past, as well!
that would never work