"As you can see, the computer clearly indicates I'm the winner of this discussion. Once you've talked to the AI and understand your failures, we can talk."
jesus fuck so many parts of this are psychic injury
the account name, the presumption of "oh yeah my opinion is right", the very nature of this person's "engagement" (quotes intentional) with conflict, the deference to non-authority (holy fuck how the fuck is it that we have worse than the personal-abdication of christianity (oh right, it's mcfuckingsaltman's fault)).....
I want to say "some of these people are in desperate need of a hug", but then as a friend of mine pointed out recently: "maybe if they weren't all such self-loathing pieces of shit they may actually get a hug"
Classy. It's funny they're trying to "reach AGI" with all this shit but they code the bots with the equivalent of Jordan Peterson's take on how emotionality is a sickness. Well plaid (SIC).
I just read something the other day that a single query like this one burns enough electricity to charge an iPhone 100 times or whatever the hell. It sounds like hyperbole but I think that number is close.
This is how humankind ends. A guy asking a fucking computer to validate his insecurity infinite times. This is how ai ultimately destroys us.
An average phone is around 12 Wh. 100 times that is 1.2 kWh. Which is like $0.20 over here. You can easily use up 1.2kWh anywhere else on equally trivial shit.
Also you heard wrong. ChatGPT uses around 2.5 Wh of energy per query. Which is less than 10x of a google query. And 1/6 that of an iPhone charge.
Edit: ChatGPT has 60 mil queries per day, when google search has 8500 million. Both are tools for searching knowledge that collectively use a lot of energy. But you usually don't look at collective usage - otherwise you get the result that drying your hair shouldn't be done - 10 mins of usage is 200W (assuming 1200W dryer), almost 17 iPhone charges. Times that by lets say 40% of the population each day, and you get ridiculous numbers too.