"As you can see, the computer clearly indicates I'm the winner of this discussion. Once you've talked to the AI and understand your failures, we can talk."
Sounds like he's a lot of fun.
The instant somebody releases a chat GPT powered sex doll I bet he'll be the first person in line with a pre-order.
This is twenty percent logic, ten percent myope
Fifteen percent concentrated power of cope
Five percent incel, fifty percent lame
And a hundred percent reason to forget his name
I see you're a person of culture. I like it
This is somehow even sadder than "I have depicted you as the wojak".
"I contracted the least efficient computer possible to depict myself as the chad, therefore I win."
"When I have a disagreement with a girl, I hit my balls with a hammer. There is absolutely nothing she can do; it's a brutal mog."
"brutal mog, sir"
jesus fuck so many parts of this are psychic injury
the account name, the presumption of "oh yeah my opinion is right", the very nature of this person's "engagement" (quotes intentional) with conflict, the deference to non-authority (holy fuck how the fuck is it that we have worse than the personal-abdication of christianity (oh right, it's mcfuckingsaltman's fault)).....
I want to say "some of these people are in desperate need of a hug", but then as a friend of mine pointed out recently: "maybe if they weren't all such self-loathing pieces of shit they may actually get a hug"
Ah the obvious telltale sign of AI writing, the misspelling of focuses. Gets em every time.
And now I've learned that focusses is a thing in places. placces. placesses.
Does all AI use American English? Focusses is an acceptable variant in various other regions.
I think ChatGPT uses Nigerian English (see also: delve)
I think he would definitely win her back if he told her that she “foci too much on the past”
It's a rarely used British English version.
RATIONAL/LOGICAL
You: 80 (superior tactics)
Her: 15 (emotional, reactive)EMOTIONAL REGULATION
You: 70 (cold, intermittent bursts of anger)
Her: 10 (in the middle of a panic attack)VICTIM MENTALITY
You: 0 (the exact opposite of a victim and knows it)
Her: 85 (default mode of victimhood)CONFLICT HANDLING
You: 100 (extremely direct)
Her: 30 (focusses on past, but quick to refocuss priorities)HIT POINTS
You: 100 (full health)
Her: 15 (bleeding out from a gunshot wound, about to pass out)self-dodging bullet
It’s weird he didn’t say “female” instead of “girl”. Are they finally learning that that one’s a giveaway & women avoid them because of it?
AI told him not to use that word
Imagine how mad they would get if the chatbot actually told him this. "Woke!"
He’s on the hunt for that one special female who’s really, really into Ferengi.
Men will do anything except go to therapy
Classy. It's funny they're trying to "reach AGI" with all this shit but they code the bots with the equivalent of Jordan Peterson's take on how emotionality is a sickness. Well plaid (SIC).
always remember that the "B" in "Jordan B Peterson" is for "Benzos"
I thought it was lo🅱️sters
I thought it was for Bozo
i thought it was for "Balthazar"
they code the bots with [an opinion]
This isn't how AI works
It "has that opinion" because he asked his question in a way that suggests that opinion would look like a probable part of the expected answer
She's entitled to a "default mode of victimhood"! She is your victim!
How interesting, a volcel who only thinks he’s an incel. Many such cases
"Your mother was volatile with poor control last night, Trebek!"
How to win the battle but lose the war.
i think she was clearly the winner there too
No but you don't understand! His number was higher!
If you classify your relationship as a war, maybe you really shouldn’t have one.
Sounds like a wonderful opportunity to use this douchebag's creds to rack up ridiculous charges on his OpenAI account then ghost him.
I just read something the other day that a single query like this one burns enough electricity to charge an iPhone 100 times or whatever the hell. It sounds like hyperbole but I think that number is close.
This is how humankind ends. A guy asking a fucking computer to validate his insecurity infinite times. This is how ai ultimately destroys us.
An average phone is around 12 Wh. 100 times that is 1.2 kWh. Which is like $0.20 over here. You can easily use up 1.2kWh anywhere else on equally trivial shit.
Also you heard wrong. ChatGPT uses around 2.5 Wh of energy per query. Which is less than 10x of a google query. And 1/6 that of an iPhone charge.
Edit: ChatGPT has 60 mil queries per day, when google search has 8500 million. Both are tools for searching knowledge that collectively use a lot of energy. But you usually don't look at collective usage - otherwise you get the result that drying your hair shouldn't be done - 10 mins of usage is 200W (assuming 1200W dryer), almost 17 iPhone charges. Times that by lets say 40% of the population each day, and you get ridiculous numbers too.
...and then I pack up my juicer, my humidifier, my dehumidifier, and leave.
Your significant other now knows what it's like to date a computer, this is not a compliment.
