how do they think they solved these fundamental issues in their proposed design?

number go up

how dare you, that's ancap jargon

link?

note that cwebber wrote the ActivityPub spec, btw

good thing Rust is only run by Palantir

nor any other

Mao just read his Adam Smith

especially for such important things like fucking tenant screening.

you must understand: this is a feature

sorry that sign's been updated

Centrists Don't Fucking Be Like This challenge not achieved yet again

https://social.kernel.org/notice/AoGpED4fw3LSGhxTLU

The mask comes off at LWN, as two editors (jake and corbet) dive in to frantically defend the honour of Justine fucking Tunney against multiple people pointing out she's a Nazi who fills her projects with racist dogwhistles

https://lwn.net/Articles/998196/

our writeup

now seeing EAs being deeply concerned about RFK running health during a H5N1 outbreak

dust specks vs leopards

they'll have to comfort themselves with a Coke(tm), apparently it's a Surreal Thing

not many people are quite aware that the word "systemic" is economics jargon meaning "RED ALERT RED ALERT HOLY SHIT RED ALERT"

i mean, the Ray Charles one sounds fun. My 1st year maths lecturer demonstrated the importance of not dividing by zero by mathematically proving that if 1=0, then he was Brigitte Bardot. We did actually applaud.

there are apparently two other prospective ads that do include AI renditions of human actors and they're as bad.

I doubt that.

look, if you just check these objectively calculated numbers,

it's so fitting that these guys are so into the AI slop as well