I'm not sure who is pushing #GlobalSwitchDay probably won't amount to anything, some of these platforms are certainly not ready a massive migration. The #RedditMigration was rough enough on Lemmy, it actually murdered #Kbin; #loops #PeerTube and #Friendica don't have nearly enough well-maintained instances to support any sort of massive migration. And Signal, well its better than WhatsApp, and its mostly Free Software, but it doesn't really align with all of the others that are, or at least intend to be in the case of Loops, federated services based on ActivityPub.
The migration was rough on lemmy? There were some growing pains for sure, but personally I was actually surprised how well the major instances handled the massive influx.
It would be fun though watching all major platforms experience loss of activity at the same time, followed by a frantic spawning of vots to "keep the conversation going"
Back in the 90s I hoped that being online would raise everyone's game and we'd all become more technical, in general, and adapt. Sometimes, now, it feels the opposite.
None of the reddit user diasporas made a dent on reddit's usage, but people did start using other platforms.
Like tiktok's ban: it's not going to move people anywhere else because most people have multiple social media accounts thanks to marketing and that's what this is.
I agree it woudl be a big ask even if the platforms could support it. I don't precieve anytime that it would even be a good idea to directly encourage such behavior. The #twittermigration and #redditmigration where natural occurences that hit the 'verse hard. I believe they were a net good for ActivityPub and Free Software as a whole, but for many users the hiccups at that time where enough to sour them to "decentralization."
Had to say that service != Software. The service indeed put restrictions, but, once released, loops can be perfectly libre software while keeping these restrictions within the service.
The same was true for the official pixelfed app and the source was eventually released. Not great, but I think it is fair not to assume malice in this case.
"Signal is better than WhatsApp" is certainly faint praise. Signal is centralised, and has historically been hostile to third party developers who dared play in their sandbox. Signal likes to flaunt their FLOSS and privacy cred, but it's basically built as another data silo, and pretty aggressively protecting their "brand".
It was LibreSignal. That was a small scale but public meltdown from Signal's founder, however. "Signal" is already a common term and as such hard to claim sole rights over.
In the same github thread he, Moxie Marlinspike, also insisted that LibreSignal abstain from using Signal's servers, which sort of defeats the purpose of a third party app. Signal's initial federation with other servers was rolled back, which again paints an image of a budding data silo.
You're right, Molly seems to have navigated the third party relationship better, perhaps because Marlinspike has been replaced with new leadership as well?
My ¢2 is this: At this point, with tech leaders making hard right political turns, or just idiosyncratic attacks like Wordpress' Mullenweg, trust in centralised services should be at a minimum.
Signal already foisted a cryptocurrency (that, incidentally, Marlinspike had consulted on) on their users. Controversial self-serving isn't new to the organisation, and with full control of a significant share of the private/secure IM market, it's only a matter of time before their stewardship veers of track.
It was more like, the single kbin dev couldn't deal with the stress of maintaining and scaling the software, so he just quit. Mbin was forked from kbin, though, and seems to be doing fine.