This is well done and much needed, Valve pretending nothing is happening because they're sitting pretty with cs is pretty disgusting. It's a monster they created and they need to cut it off in the backend even if it means a huge loss of revenue.
Thoughtfully punctuated by the video author's note of how far self-regulation will ever possibly go.
Asking valve to police this is like asking the national Treasury to police gambling.
The fact that skins can be traded is a good thing. Just needs actual laws and enforcement.
Not allowing gambling on skins is such a knee jerk reaction to this. As you see there's sites that do the same thing with irl items.
I would like to see the comparison to real sports more heavily highlighted. You cannot find a single sports event in America that's not sponsored by gambling sites.
What are the downsides to banning it for us?
Basically, the same systems that allow Skin gambling also allow for trading and 3rd party marketplaces. You can't just disable one without disabling the other. They could ban it on paper but enforcing those bans technically will likely just lead to users/victums lossing more as casinos would be unable to payout owed earnings.
That leaves legal enforcement, but Valve isn't a government body - they don't have the authority to investigate these casinos, and have limitted ability to enforce the law. They're effectively manufacturing poker chips and releasing them into an open market where they don't have authority (nor should they). Instead, illegal casinos should be investigated and prosecuted by the government - its supposed to be their responsiblity to handle exactly this sort of thing. They have the ability to seize casino property to investigate them or collect information, and the ability to fine them and enforce fines, unlike Valve which can do neither. As even noted in the video, the have sent cease and desist letters in the past, but casinos can changed names, changed owners, ect. and nothing changed.
Edit: For clairity, free trading is what allows these sites to work. Valve will disable account's ability to trade in some cases such as where their services are directly abused on-platform, but they don't have access to trade negotiations and things obviously get messy when it comes to trying to mediate bad or unfair deals (such as the case with these casinos.) That means Valve has four options to tackle this:
-
Do nothing.
-
Send cease and desist notices to the casinos and/or persue legal action where possible. This leads to individual casinos closing and then a new one is immediately re-opened to take its place as there isn't any cost to then.
-
Disable the accounts of these casinos. The problem is that this effectively freezes their cashflow both in and out. Anyone waiting on a cash-out effectively immediatly loses everything, and given the long transaction times and sizes of these casinos, this will likely hurt a lot of victims. At the same time, while they lose some of their assets, casinos can still walk away with a lot of their current profits. This just turns it into a game of whack a mole, where casios pop up, make a small fortune, then get banned and effectivly rugpull their userbase.
-
Disable trading and possibly marketplace, which sucks for regular users and means all sales much go through Valve storefront with no room for competition or price negotiation. No more giving friends spare skins, and no more bypassing Valve's 5% royalty fee on sales. This also has the same issue as #3.
-
You'll have a hard time finding a jurisdiction where minors gambling (even behind the veil of "we don't check who our customers are") is legal. The "IRL item gambling" site in the video was in fact blatantly illegal in Denmark despite the lengths to which they went to pretend "it's not gambling because the house always loses".
Asking Valve to police gambling is the next best thing to do if governments won't step in. You say it like it's an impossibility, ignoring the fact that "state-run gambling" is quite a common setup. In France for instance all money games are run by la française des jeux, a state-owned monopoly whose profits are meant to go to charity. In the US it wouldn't be a crazy idea either, given how many US states already have state-run monopolies for alcohol sales for example. It's not like historical precedent is lacking to show that regulating a parasitic industry is possible...
Maybe you can find examples of other industries that are heavily infected with gambling bullshit, but that's whataboutism and in no way relevant to the discussion.
I don't think it's an unreasonable ask either, but from what I understand, Valve is incredibly libertarian, like more than the libertarian party libertarian. Their politics and policies are freedom freedom freedom, and any form of regulation is sheer anathema to them.
Counter Strike's online market is the 1.0 alpha build of memecoins.
CS2 has been the worst update to a game I've ever seen in my life. The game runs so much worse and doesn't look as good as you'd expect with how bad it performs. Deadlock barely runs too well too
I really thought valve wouldn't fall into this crap but damn. I remember back when any source game was so well optimized it ran on my core2duo integrated graphics.
CS2 has been the worst update to a game I’ve ever seen in my life. The game runs so much worse and doesn’t look as good as you’d expect with how bad it performs.
Are you playing CS2 on a Game Boy? 🤣
CS2 runs absolutely fine on my notebook that's approaching 4 years of age, at least on Win11.
It runs at 1080p 100 fps on a 1060. Are you still gaming on the core duo igpu?
Nope, ryzen 2600, 32 gigs of RAM, and I had an AMD rx5500 but just upgraded to an Intel arc A750.
