Finland’s successful approach to ending homelessness catches eye of Quebec City
Finland’s successful approach to ending homelessness catches eye of Quebec City
Quebec City Mayor Bruno Marchand has suggested that the solution to the crisis may be a Finnish model, which is a 'housing first' approach that aims to give everyone a home.
Quebec City Mayor Bruno Marchand has suggested that the solution to the crisis may be a Finnish model, which is a 'housing first' approach that aims to give everyone a home.
Never have I seen so many people with so many unworkable solutions to a problem take so long to come to the most obvious solution. Just give people homes. Don’t let people die on the street, it’s inhumane.
Yeah but... capitalism?
And where do you propose to home these mentally ill folks? I got it! On your street, near your property, with your kids and your spouse.
OR, we could just build them a giant cinderblock dog kennel outside of town, lock 'em in so they don't fuck up everything they come near.
OR, we can provide mental health care, like we used to. Lock 'em away forever in asylums.
FFS, know how I know you've never worked or lived around the homeless?
the most obvious solution
I'll wait while you spell it out.
I’m not afraid of homeless people. There was a homeless encampment a couple blocks from my old place. I had some great conversations with several of them. They’re just people.
And guess what. Once you give them a home, they’re not homeless people.
Sounds simple. But Finland is an insular society and has different social issues.
In my city, there was a push to put social housing in place, as most of the local homeless population lacked the skills to maintain a house by themselves. Mental illness and addiction together affect a very large part of the homeless population.
The result was that some people who sorely needed housing got some, and a lot of people refused to take part because they didn’t want to agree to other people’s rules.
And then the social housing attracted people from nearby communities so that it’s now full, but the majority of the local homeless from before the project started are still homeless.
Just saying that “just give everyone a home” may sound simple, but in reality is very complex.
What you’re describing is not “just give everyone a home”, so I’m not surprised it didn’t work.
What city was this that tried housing first and it didn’t work? I’m interested in reading the details
a lot of people refused to take part because they didn’t want to agree to other people’s rules
Gosh, I can't imagine why such people are homeless. Total mystery.
I am reading a book on supporting universal basic income, and it provided all examples of the times when the homeless were provided unconditional income and a home. Every cities in the world that did this have been successful in eliminating homelessness.
This is not a Finnish model, it's common sense.
What's the name of the book?
"Utopia for Realists"
has suggested that the solution to the crisis may be a Finnish model, which is a 'housing first' approach that aims to give everyone a home.
Fixing homelessness by giving people a home! I'm not sure that's going to work.....facepalm
Downvote the shit out of me, but explain how this works in the above case where one (let's even expand it a bit and say) nation chooses to do this, and everyone homeless around the world with the means to make the journey, decides to head down there and enter the country by whatever means? We're not talking about a taxpayer base, just a whole ton of people that want homes, and of course some small subset of those people that want free homes. People seems to scoff at the "it's a complex problem" thing because they don't think of the solution to homelessness within the confines of reality.
How is housing a domestic homeless person and different from housing an immigrant, from a national economics point of view? It's not like the former paid any taxes so far.
I'm curious if this is what happened in Finland?
It’s almost like the only solution is to de commodify housing everywhere, globally, and provide everyone shelter because it’s a human right and so clearly works to fix many mental health problems.
It’s almost like C A P I T A L I S M does not inherently provide a good living standard to everyone, and allows the very wealthiest to pit us against each other in a rat race to the bottom. “Decommodification means someone will take your house!” No. It means you’ll always have a place to live and enough housing will be built to support the entire population. It means that billionaires will have to give up their extra homes.
Every homeless around the world with the means to make the journey... Is a number thats only irrelevantly larger than 0
But this is just common sense?
I don't necessarily disagree, but why isn't it widely adopted then?
It really should be catching the eye of all cities / countries with large homeless issues.
The same people who say give them homes don't want to pay for it
The program has actually SAVED money, so this should be enough incentive for taxpayers to want to support it.