Trump said to lift all military restrictions on Israel on 1st day in office according to reports

When I pointed out that Harris supporters shouldn't have embraced genocide on the day of the election I got a temp ban for "trolling".

Maybe do some introspection.

Who was embracing genocide? At least here most people are pro Palestine
- They're pretending there was some other possibility besides Harris or Trump.
  
  The future is always an open question, my friend. And Harris always had the ability to change her stance.
  
  I'll bet you any amount of money that the next president is either the Dem or Rep nominee.
  
  I repeated this over and over before the 2020 election. No one took me up on it.
  
  I repeated it over and over again before the most recent election. No one took me up on it.
  
  And no one will take me up on it for 2028 either because we all know what's going to happen. So let's stop pretending like we don't.
  
  Exactly. For a country with as many mass shootings as we see we are a soft country. People strap bombs to their chest to achieve less toward their own goals. These brats think major change will happen in a year. The reality is that if you want major change you got to accept that it is unlikely to happen out life times.
But you're ok embracing Trump genocide?
- No? Why are you making things up?
  
  Am I? If you don't think we get more genocide with Trump you are willfully not paying attention.
  
  Almost everyone in north Gaza will be dead by new years. That happened entirely under Biden. Do you think Trump will kill them a second time?
  
  We all know Trump is objectively worse but your argument is terrible; it’s like the Americans saying we should overlook Bush’s atrocities like Abu Ghraib because Saddam Hussein was worse. No, that’s just a fallacy.
  
  Your premise is based on this: "Almost everyone in north Gaza will be dead by new years. "
  
  Which is clearly and obviously false. Check back with me on Jan 1.
  
  "Do you think Trump will kill them a second time?"
  
  The Trump administration will enable the complete erasure of the Palestinian people and their land. Huckabee has said as much already. Israelis have said as much too. I believe them.
  
  Finally, do you think nothing else matters? Do you think the consequences of a Trump administration beyond Palestine don't matter? If so, I'd encourage you to spend less time virtue signaling and more time checking your privilege.
  
  The UN has said it explicitly. Famine has taken place and aid is not allowed in. Biden withdrew his ultimatum and the Generals Plan is being implemented. But are you happy if only 70% of North Gazans died then man you sure showed me up.
  
  It’s no question Trump is worse for West Bank and Palestinian aspirations, because he’s only accelerating the same policy that Biden agreed to. In terms of Gaza there really is no difference; the four years of Biden was worse for their lives than 4 years of Trump. But you’re being offensive by saying I need to ignore the Palestinian people whose funerals I attended because Trump is going to do the same thing in a nastier way. You dismissing my community’s real pain as virtue signaling just shows how out of touch you are and why Harris lost. Listen for a change.
  
  If you want me to listen you should probably say something beyond vague platitudes and "your argument is terrible".
  
  What astounds me is that you expect me to be completely consumed with what's important to you while you are completely dismissive of what's important to me. As if somehow the ONLY issue that mattered in this election was the Palestinian people. As if every horrible horrible thing that is going to happen under Trump to American people has to take back seat to YOUR cause. That's the definition of virtue signaling and it's incredibly offensive to me.
  
  Feel free to have the last word but I won't engage with you further.

I mean, assuming everyone on an instance has exactly the same views is kind of asinine. You won't find me pushing that shit. And plenty of others from ml also.

Most dissidents have been banned from .world to keep the echo chamber functional.

you've got .ml and others, that's where all the "dissidents" hang out. Must be hard to be a dissident when everyone agrees with you.
- .ml has some trigger happy mods but nobody gets banned for criticizing the democratic party for supporting a genocide.
  
  You can tell how much of an echo chamber it is here since there are no weapons restrictions for Trump to lift. Because the democrats did not place any.
  
  .ml has some trigger happy mods but nobody gets banned for criticizing the democratic party for supporting a genocide.
  
  Oh you don't get banned for going along with Russian propaganda? Wow, weird huh.
  
  But then you do get banned for pointing out Russian propaganda.
  
  Here.
  
  That's @[email protected] pushing against BlueSky, spreading his usual bullshit links about "Nazis". He thinks Ukraine is filled with Nazis and Russia was right to invade it. Now "BlueSky is filled with Nazis"
  
  It doesn't take a genius to suss this out, but that's what the poorly educated Russians don't get. Or they rely on Americans being equally stupid, which is a good bet, honestly.
  
  But for people with a normal amount of media/political literacy? Lol.
  
  Everything I'm told by the state media is good and correct and everything would be fine if it weren't for the underhanded secret ~~jews~~ russians feeding dissent
  
  Hey! Why am I being banned for following a user around and making personal attacks at them??
  
  YOU'RE ALL JUST A BUNCH OF J-I MEAN RUSSIANS
  
  You guys genuinely can't argue like adults, it's very irritating.
  
  I've not followed anyone around nor have I made any personal attacks. Is "are you pro-Russian?" a personal attack in your opinion? I guess we'll find out.
  
  Are you pro-Russian?
  
  Do you believe Russia has broken international law with their illegal war of aggression by invading Ukraine in February 2022?
  
  (And I know you won't answer any of that, you'll just continue with the garbage quality propaganda. Which is to say utilising shitty rhetoric to push your agenda. Ie the childish nature of your wannabe argument. I wish you could see just how ridiculous it is, but you're genuinely not able to. If you were, you'd be too ashamed to write that, lol.)
  
  Stimulus: "You're falling into the exact antisemetic tropes The Protocols of the Elders of Zion inspired in the late 18th century. You're just replacing 'Russian' for 'Jew' for your paranoid delusions that act as thought stoppers for any dissent"
  
  Response: "YOU SOUND LIKE A SECRET JEW"
  
  See before; "I know you won't answer any of that."
  
  If only you saw how childish your rhetoric is. I can actually show you. We'll have a whole conversation about it, and I'll teach you to use it better... after you reply to a simple yes or no question: Do you believe Russia has broken international law with their illegal war of aggression by invading Ukraine in February 2022?
True, anything vaguely pro Israel gets deleted and banned.
- Wait, defending genocide is seen as a bad thing?
  
  faints in bootlicker

In what way were we wrong? Did we ever claim Trump would be good on Gaza?

There were two ways to vote for Trump. 1) Mark Trump on your ballot and turn it in, or 2) Not vote for Harris, not turn in a ballot at all.

Quit being coy, just take a bow and acknowledge your victory. You stood strong against genocide, and helped elect the only candidate who can't be reasoned with and whose stated political policy was to SPEED UP THE GENOCIDE. Congrats! If you thought their blood wasn't on your hands before, it absolutely is now.
- There were two ways to vote for Trump. 1) Mark Trump on your ballot and turn it in, or 2) Not vote for Harris, not turn in a ballot at all.
  
  In that case, Trump has won with an overwhelming majority in every election he's ever run in, since nonvoters are like half the population and all of them count as voting for Trump.
  
  Back here in reality, that's not how it works.
- There were two ways to vote for Trump. 1) Mark Trump on your ballot and turn it in, or 2) Not vote for Harris, not turn in a ballot at all.
  
  By this logic a vote for Jill Stein would be a vote for Harris, lol. Question your political masters, this just isn't logical at all.
  
  Quit being coy, just take a bow and acknowledge your victory.
  
  It is good for Democratic voters to have failed while supporting genocide. You shouldn't support genocide and I shouldn't have to lecture you like this. Be a good person.
  
  You stood strong against genocide, and helped elect the only candidate who can't be reasoned with and whose stated political policy was to SPEED UP THE GENOCIDE.
  
  Israel already has unconditional support for its genocide and opened up two new fronts with the suppory of the Biden-Harris administration. Israel does not have one hsnd tied behind its back. The dominant global empire supports it materially and diplomatically.
  
  Your lesser evil logic means nothing here. It is again just a thought terminating cliché from your political masters. Instead of justifying lesser-evil genocide, please go and inform yourself and work to help others.
  
  Congrats! If you thought their blood wasn't on your hands before, it absolutely is now.
  
  Blood is on the hands of those committing and supporting genocide, not those who fifht against it. Look at how this political illogic has twisted your understanding of basic reality.
  
  When you see a .world account you just have to assume they're one of the dumbest most evil motherfuckers you've ever met.
Yes. Now fuck off.
- I bet you couldn't even name a single example
- exit polls showed that harris lost mainly on the economy. You just want to pretend it was gaza so you can point fingers.
  
  God forbid someone point a finger for supporting genocide
  
  Nope, it was the apathy. Democrats that came out to vote for Biden 4 years ago stayed home. That's a FACT you can count in the number of votes cast this election vs last.
  
  You know what else is a fact? People that stayed home and didn't vote DIDN'T GET EXIT POLLED.
  
  Exit polls and polls leading up to election. Come on now, lets not mince words or pretend the data wasnt obvious. They did know. It was all over the news snce the day she started her run.
  
  "The economy, particularly inflation and the cost of living, is the primary issue for a majority of voters."
  
  https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm24g1nj364o
  
  Bidens historically low approval rating was well documented, and the reason for it being low was well understood. She chose to say that "she couldnt think of anything she'd change" or something like that. She ran on a platform that had already ended up on the rocks long ago. Centrists just put their fingers in their ears and pretended Biden was the second coming of FDR whenever Biden was criticised, but the numbers were there waiting to be read if you cared about reality and dropped the infantile "rooting for your sports team, blue no matter who" mentality.
  
  88% of Americans disagreed with how the US was acting in the Israeli war on gazans. Did you think that would be cost-free, or that Biden showed he had votes to burn in the last election or the ones before that? he didnt. Harris knew that wouldnt be consequence free. She ran with it anyway. Thats just Bidens stubborn rightwing-fellating petulant stupidity thats been the hallmark of his entire career bleeding into Harrnis' campaign. A competent politician wouldnt have taken on that baggage when it was so obviously going to cost big in swing states.
  
  https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/arab-american-voters-struggle-to-back-harris-over-u-s-support-for-israels-war-in-gaza
  
  "The vice president has said she would not change from Biden’s policies, and argued that Israel has a right to defend itself. But she has also said that far too many innocent Palestinians have been killed"
  
  https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4895174-democrats-middle-east-conflict/
  
  Exit polls are flawed in the sense that the people who don't vote aren't there to begin with.
  
  Oh so now we trust polls. Got it.
- Link or it didn't happen.
  
  Harris lost because of a lack of blue voters who didn't get an exit poll.
  
  There were more red there, and they claim to have voted because of economy because racism and hurting the other team wasn't on the official ticket.
Genocide Joe has been an established term for months.

Bruh, I'm just here for the memes. But I can start commenting on political stuff more to even out my instance's biases if that would help. Honestly haven't paid much attention to which trolls were from where, but I'll take your word for it...

I don't understand the downvotes.
- It's fine, the internet will internet. Unless someone tells me what I've done wrong, I'm just gonna assume one downvote gave it the initial velocity for more downvotes. Trying to understand it beyond that will make you go crazy.