In 5 years: Computer, make a WWDITS Disney-Pixar style cartoon series with full-length episodes!
In 15 years: it'll actually be funny
31 3 Reply*Looks at state of LLMs 5-15 years ago….
I think it’s gonna be a lot sooner than that.
6 1 ReplyI dunno. Expecting a computer to understand current comedy enough to make genuinely funny jokes, let alone entire episodes, is a huge ask. I don’t think that’ll happen in 15 years.
6 2 ReplyI think it could happen in 15 years, but it'll be a regurgitation/reworking of jokes/setups from other shows it has processed and 17 years from now we'll start to realize that.
Three hundred years from now AI will be superior and give us amazing content to watch while we're plugged into the Matrix.
9 0 ReplyJabrils got pretty close with his AI Shark Tank episodes.
The ideas may be crowdsourced, but the jokes in between were pretty good.
A computer doesn't need to understand humor, it just need to know how it works.
So I see it taking a lot less than 15 years.
2 0 ReplyHere's a humorous scene about people discussing the potential for funny AI:
INT - OFFICE - DAY
Two coworkers, JEN and DAVID, are chatting by the water cooler.
JEN Did you hear they're trying to create AI with a sense of humor?
DAVID Seriously? A funny robot comedian?
JEN Yeah, some tech company claims they've programmed it to understand jokes and tell its own.
DAVID That seems...ambitious. I can't imagine a robot actually being funny.
JEN I know, humor is such a human thing. But maybe with machine learning and big data it could work.
DAVID I feel like the first shows would be pretty rough. Knock-knock jokes and bad puns.
JEN "Why did the robot cross the road? To get to the other side!" You're right, it would be terrible!
They both laugh.
JEN Well, maybe someday artificial intelligence will get there. But for now, just leave the jokes to the humans.
DAVID Yeah, robots should stick to calculus - leave the comedy to professionals like us!
They laugh again and fist bump as the scene ends.
Ok, this is a bit worse than I thought. Curious to see what GPT4 would do.
1 1 ReplyHave you seen the recent R&M eps? 😅 Ohwait. You said "funny".
2 2 Reply
I need to see the whole cast now
18 1 ReplyExcept for the Colin Robinson one, it will have multiple irritating AI flaws and inevitably drain your energy
17 0 ReplyIf the average Lemmy user wanted to see an image of an energy vampire they could just go look in a mirror.
Goes off on an unprompted tangent about Linux and why using Chrome is bad.
9 1 ReplyPretty sure that was 6yr-old Colin Robinson, already. (Some of those CG heads were wacky)
5 0 Reply
And that sexy bartender Jackie Daytona, don't forget him.
7 0 Reply
Adorbs!!
12 1 ReplyWay less creepy than the doll. Lol!
8 0 ReplyNeeds more songs about the prostitute with a short leg.
8 0 ReplyWhat movie is this on?nevermind saw the description
2 0 ReplyThe "bonus one" didn't show up for me in Sync so I had to open it in a browser. (@[email protected] ...not sure if that's a known bug of some sort)
Very cool though!
1 0 ReplyWorks for me
4 0 ReplyIt doesn't work for me, what is it? Do you get to see her boobs?
1 0 ReplyYes.
It's been established that it must be something to do with the settings I use.
1 0 Reply
Shows up fine for me
1 0 ReplyMust be something to do with the settings I use then.
1 0 Reply
As in bland, lacking in distinctiveness, drained of personality, with bizarrely unrealistic physical proportions designed by horny lonely men, and made to look unnecessarily young regardless of her age?
No thanks.
6 19 Replydesigned by horny lonely men
I see nothing sexualized about this at all. You may be experiencing some local interference.
9 0 ReplyWho hurt you, poppet?
8 3 ReplyIt's pretty common to go for exaggerated or idealistic proportions, especially with this art style. And a lot of stylised characters end up looking young. The whole rounded Disney style does lack distinctiveness and personality now though, it's been overused.
3 0 Reply