"Submarine scrapped 19 years after the 'battle'" is a weird way of saying it sustained no damage.
76 0 ReplyThey played the long con
18 0 ReplyThat's the joke
6 0 Reply
We now know that cars are not an effective anti-submarine countermeasure.
57 0 ReplyNo, too many variables. We only know that a Volvo PV544 isn't effective against that particular Swedish submarine. We now need to crash several different cars against several different submarines several times, for science!
46 0 ReplyWhat do you mean they had to scrap the submarine
14 0 ReplyNo, no. You just need to up the acceleration.
Strap some rockets to that bastard, and let 'em go again.
7 0 Reply
Wel dat is een regel
14 0 ReplyIn Sweden, it is illegal to break the regel
10 0 ReplyAnd in the netherlands its illegal to not follow the wet
3 0 Reply
Well There's Your Problem
9 0 ReplyThe worst tragedy in the history of the town. The driver remained scarred by the experience. He finally overcame it five minutes later when he was offered a beer
7 0 ReplyResult: Swedish defeat
LMAO
6 0 ReplyI searched this "battle" up and couldn't find the original article. Did find that it's been reposted a lot though.
3 0 ReplyOh wow you couldn't find this original very real article? How strange
6 0 ReplyYou think someone would just lie like that 😰
2 0 Replyhttps://digitaltmuseum.se/021015749757/kollision-mellan-bil-och-ubat
The text in OPs fake-screenshot is fake; but the photo/incident itself seems real
2 0 Reply
Sweden only had like 2 car brands back then... :) Volvo and Saab I guess.
1 0 ReplyVolvo ♥️
1 0 ReplyAverage Volvo driver:
(I only drive Saab)
1 0 ReplyDrive it like you hate it .
1 0 Reply
Volvo stronk 💪💪
1 0 ReplyThe Huge Mermaid
(Joke explanation: The Little Mermaid from under the sea meets the Prince, but this Mermaid is huge.)
1 0 Reply