Democratic leaders are failing the Mahmoud Khalil test - Trump is pushing a new McCarthyism. But Democrats helped get us here.
Democratic leaders are failing the Mahmoud Khalil test - Trump is pushing a new McCarthyism. But Democrats helped get us here.
Trump is pushing a new McCarthyism. But Democrats helped get us here.
President Donald Trump’s attempt to deport pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil marks one of Trump’s most egregious assaults on democratic liberties since taking office. Yet too many Democrats, particularly in party leadership, are responding to Trump in the most mealymouthed way possible. But this is a problem of Democrats’ own making: Their trepidation stems from their own history of repressing speech critical of Israel — and now we’re all at risk of paying the price for it.
If you've read American history books, there is absolutely nothing new about this.
But that's also a reason to be optimistic. It's happened before and it didn't last.
Man...
If only a large amount of dem voters had tried to warn people that Israel weren't our friends before it was too late...
How many people are still happy we didn't hold Biden accountable when we could for violating US and international law to provide arms that would be used in a genocide?
If we can't protest when it's a Dem doing it because it makes them look bad to voters, and we can't protest when it's a Republican because this will happen...
How are we supposed to address the fact that Israel bought the leaders of both political parties long ago?
The only way we can fix the country is fixing our own party first, and one of the big steps is voting out anyone that takes AIPAC money.
It's not really a party problem specifically - they're more of a symptom. In reality, the FPTP winner-takes-all (with questionable SCOTUS and congression checks and balances), high risk, expensive break down then rebuild then break down then rebuild full pendulum swing incentivizes these mechanisms that result in no one winning, and a generation of setbacks every time you take a step forward.
In fairness, Trump is trying to "fix" this - you just may not agree that an authoritarian corporatocracy with him as Supreme Chancellor of the Galactic Republic is the right solution (and, frankly, most wouldn't).
if it's genociders vs terrorists which side is your party going to support?
Sadly, I don't have your faith that the system will allow us to fix it. It's not our system, it never was, and the people in power have no reason to abolish themselves and put democracy in charge.
There is no "fixing it", the real question is how we'll navigate the interesting times ahead.
Neoliberals are pussies and we got a solid head of the DNC that won't blindly back incumbents and understands the Victory Funds nonsense is why Republicans have the House.
The fight over the party happened like a month ago, we won bro.
You're not hearing about it from mainstream news, because it's all owned by conservative billionaires.
This is the best shit we've had to fix the party in 30 years. Don't throw it away because you're a pessimist, we'll still need all the help we can get to do it.
I swear, Lemmy is EXACTLY like Reddit...one sided in every way....
Reality has a known liberal bias.
If it was good old trying to weed out the commies McCarthyism, I'd be all down for it. Now I ain't because it ain't communism that's the enemy.
I can't imagine you've read much about McCarthyism because it didn't take long for it to be many things that aren't communism. Labour unions and homosexuality were just a couple things that could get you on their radar, and merely being brought before a committee could get you fired. House Un-American Activities Committee sounds more like their job description and not what they were trying to stamp out.
Democrats are the greater evil in this case, Republicans are openly vocal in their intents so we know what to expect from them. Democrats vocally oppose Republican actions, but end up supporting them and throwing their hands up claiming they were defenseless. Theyve turbo changed their ratchet effect the last several years.
Greater evil? One is being evil and the other is overly pragmatic.
Which is exactly how you wanted it to happen. Just fuck off, we don’t need the grief on the way down.
Which is exactly how you wanted it to happen.
Was there another option?