90% of folks can't be trained to kill.

Half of the remainder would rather frag their own commanding officers than some poor foreign kid.

Let me correct you:

"Survive maybe, protest never. There is no effective way to send a message regardless of how many people have or will die."

I have a hard time blaming the voters for anything when they live in the most heavily propagandized country on the planet. Ultimately the voters opinions don't matter when they can be shaped by billions of dollars in ads and media time.

He's annoying, but he's right.

If they didn't want to lose because of protest votes they should have thrown a bone to the protesters before the election.

The DNC chose this, everything else is just an attempt to deflect blame.

The only other message that could be sent is "Yes, good, keep doing that."

Dunno who's downvoting you, you're right

American voters have zero agency. We only exist to pay taxes and legitimize the state, which is not obligated to provide us with actual options to vote for.

The back half of the shell is easy though, I swapped mine with a transluscent purple backplate a few months back. ^_

I voted for Harris, how did that work for me? Did she win?

No, because I don't support a weapons ban. That's beside the point.

On the contrary, that's precisely the point.

Why do you keep acting like people who don't support the things you do are obligated to support your preferred candidate?

If the result was inevitable then the voters have no agency and are in no way responsible for the outcome.

I think you're smart enough to know how a FPTP voting system works.

Indeed, the party with the most votes wins.

We had 2 real options. Voters have agency as to which one of the two are elected. Stop pretending like you don't understand how this works.

This proves that we don't share political perspectives, because there were no real options. Just the inevitable and the also-rans.

You’re giving the most heavily propagandized segment of the most heavily propagandized country on earth a lot of credit when they can’t even seem to understand that a tarrif is a tax on imports.

How sad is it then that this group understands this better than you pretend to?

There's no "understanding" involved, as proved by the fact that those people voted for higher prices out of "economic anxiety". You just don't want to admit that the Republican party is better at convincing people to vote for it than the Democrats.

No, it would be like funding a third party candidate that is close to Trump with the express purpose of peeling votes off Trump.

They do that too, hence the Libertarian party.

Damn that’s crazy because here’s me before the election telling the future. How in the world did I perform this feat? Do I have amazing powers of precognition?

Did you ever write to your congressional representatives like they suggested?

Again, you’re telling us what you’d wish would happen. I was telling them what would happen.

If the result was inevitable then the voters have no agency and are in no way responsible for the outcome.

What's more is this is a concept that both the GOP and their voters understand.

You're giving the most heavilly propagandized segment of the most heavily propagandized country on earth a lot of credit when they can't even seem to understand that a tarrif is a tax on imports.

It's why the GOP funds campaigns like Stein and gets others like RFK Jr. to bow out.

You mean like how the Democrats promoted Trump thinking that he'd be an easy win for Hillary?

If you think that what happened before must inevitably happen again then you are the problem. The major parties only win because they have people like you convinced that they are the only option.

Are you not aware that draft dodging was a crime?

Conservatives, liberals, and neoliberals are all just subtypes of the classical liberal.

I get one of these long hairs on the very top of my ears. It's weird.

And Democrats tried to appeal to MAGA instead of their own voting base.

If they didn't set themselves up to be the only solution then they should disband so another party could do so.

You're describing an oligarchy with extra steps, not Democracy.

These terms are rather well understood by leftists, it's only liberals who think they mean the same thing.