Another lawyer was caught using AI and not checking the output for accuracy, while a previously-reported case just got hit with sanctions.
But the explanation and Ramirez’s promise to educate himself on the use of AI wasn’t enough, and the judge chided him for not doing his research before filing. “It is abundantly clear that Mr. Ramirez did not make the requisite reasonable inquiry into the law. Had he expended even minimal effort to do so, he would have discovered that the AI-generated cases do not exist. That the AI-generated excerpts appeared valid to Mr. Ramirez does not relieve him of his duty to conduct a reasonable inquiry,” Judge Dinsmore continued, before recommending that Ramirez be sanctioned for $15,000.
Falling victim to this a year or more after the first guy made headlines for the same is just stupidity.
Hold them in contempt. Put them in jail for a few days, then declare a mistrial due to incompetent counsel. For repeat offenders, file a formal complaint to the state bar.
"For the reasons set forth above, the Undersigned, in his discretion, hereby
RECOMMENDS that Mr. Ramirez be personally SANCTIONED in the amount of $15,000
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for submitting to the Court and opposing counsel,
on three separate occasions, briefs that contained citations to non-existent cases. In addition, the
Undersigned REFERS the matter of Mr. Ramirez's misconduct in this case to the Chief Judge
pursuant to Local Rule of Disciplinary Enforcement 2(a) for consideration of any further
discipline that may be appropriate"
Mr. Ramirez is the dumbass lawyer that didn't check his dumbass AI. If you read above the paragraph I copied from, he gets laid into by the judge in writing to justify recommendation for sanctions and discipline. Good catch by the judge and the processes they have for this kind of thing.