It seems like the narrative when interpreted by the being's set of neural weights is capable of instilling aggravation, which in turn instills dismissive content from the other being due to the apparent incoherence. This makes me click upon the point increment system of the submission.
Why does Ross, the largest friend, not simply eat the other five?
Don't blame me. I voted for Kodos.
Dolores Umbridge. I'm out.
I take umbridge with Umbridge, but solace in that she was dragged away by centaurs for "re-education" at the end
She came back for the last book, though.
Isn’t she just Rowling’s self-insertion character?
Every post on reddit's AITA recently.
"Please generate a rage-inducing story, in the first-person, in the style of..."
That sub has always been the biggest circle-jerk on reddit. There are so many jerkings within the circle that you can smell them from the next website over.
The alien saying "ok" seems out of character, rather than something like "I see"
Fuck Moash
"Journey before destination, you bastard"
I came here to make this same post. Fuck Moash.
Why do these always fail to grab image?
I've only ever seen images fail to load on lemmey.world
Is Furious and Loving It a sequel to Dracula: Dead and Loving It?
EDIT: or maybe a crossover of Fast and Furious and Dracula: Dead and Loving It?
Why would you need to resort to fiction to find someone to hate!?
They usually have a satisfying conclusion, unlike in reality.
Is this the same artist that's against woman getting abortions? I wish they thought differently about that; some woman go though intense situations like rape and need access to abortions
According to Wikipedia, he personally seems anti-abortion due to religious beliefs but also doesn't seem to support that the government make religiously fueled mandates. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_W._Pyle#Political_views
Here's the response tweet made to the controversy: https://nitter.privacydev.net/nathanwpyle/status/1115684701069611008#m
Thanks for letting me know
