I used to think the plot of Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty was absolutely bonkers until the internet became flooded with AI slop
I used to think the plot of Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty was absolutely bonkers until the internet became flooded with AI slop
Was getting ready this morning and the ending of MGS2 came to mind.
It states that GW was the only AI destroyed, and that the S3 Plan's real purpose is to control human thought to prevent society's regression in the digital era from trivial information drowning knowledge and truth in the belief that humanity is too immature to handle the flow of information responsibly
Though the villains in MGS2 seemed to have better intentions than the nation states / trolls that are flooding the internet today.
You should listen to Senator Armstrong's speech from Rising and ask yourself if he'd get votes in today's political landscape.
I think he'd have a noticeable percentage of the voting base of America.
Standing here
I realise
You're just like me
Trying to make historyBut who's to judge
The right from wrong
When our guard is down I think we'd both agree
That violence breeds violence
But in the end
It has to be this wayRaiden is 100% wrong about Armstrong approaching any of that situation in good faith. But it's a great song and Raiden became cooler when he accepted that he's allowed to do "bad" things to bad people.
"I told you that my sword is a tool of justice. Not to be used in anger. BUT THIS ISN'T MY SWORD."
I disagree that Armstrong didn't approach that situation in good faith. I think he meant every word he said. Armstrong was a caricature of American Individualism and a diehard fanatic. If you watch his speech now, there's a lot in there that sounds familiar to modern politics. Including "they'll make America great again!"
He's a villain who comes off as a "might makes right" true believer. It doesn't matter if it's physical strength, underhanded tactics, cleverness, or sheer endurance. So long as you win, you make the rules.
He believed that the strong should squash the weak, while Raiden believed that the strong should protect the weak, and they both used violence to enforce their beliefs. In his eyes, neither of them were right. Who would decide the rules merely came down to which of them was stronger.
Raiden is Armstrong's beliefs made manifest. From surviving as a child soldier up to the very moment that he kills Armstrong, he's enforcing his will on the world around him through his strength. A shift in perspective, which side of the sword you're on, and Raiden's justice becomes the same as Armstrong's oppression.
This is the danger of a true believer of "might makes right." Because even when you beat them, you didn't prove them wrong - you merely played by their rules and beat them at their own game. Your might made you right, and nothing more.
If they were right about that, then we should start looking out for vocal chord parasites that'll turn us into zombies.
I have a coworker currently playing through that one now. I'm really excited for him to get to the end to see what he thinks about it considering our current circumstances.
Also: "I hear it's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on hara-kiri rock. I need scissors! 61!"
Call of duty in early 2010s also covered fake news too... It sounded clown back then...
Oh boy are we here now