They didn't ask because genocide is a US government thing, not a president thing. Good luck being against the industrial military complex AND becoming president of the US.
You could also claim that serving the rich is a US government thing and not a president thing. Does that mean our votes mean nothing if the president is filtered through a system that only selects for a particular set of policies?
There are some common policies they have to play ball with, and commonly shared interest like Israel. You just hear about them less.
Im not saying it shouldn't be questioned, it's just not a great top 5 you want to send to your boss because both candidates will avoid the question/lie
I wanted to respond to people on Mastodon hyping this propaganda with a question about the 500 pound bombs and how it would ever be a win for Biden to stop a genocide that he armed. Democrat centrists spout the oddest bootlicking shit.
ALT Text:
Tweet by Politico’s Sam Stein:
“The killer for the White House and campaign has to be that there is tons of great/good news that is getting buried right now
The Biden crowd is now saying we need to keep Biden as candidate because he is tough on Netanyahu and he is doing a great job reigning in the Genocide.
I did not think this level of cognitive dissonance was possible for Democrats. Usually they need a semblance of reality but it's Blue MAGA is full steam ahead.
They have defended Biden through all the Genocide, it seems they genuinely don't know how to react to anything in another way than unconditionally defending Biden anymore.
Even when it's obvious they need to swap him out or he will lose to Trump. Blue MAGA doesn't want to win they just want Genocide Joe.
Anyone they swap in will also be "mildly concerned with but still selling arms to and defending Israel," as this is what the backers want (or are too afraid to back away from).