If you destroy it, that will be the end of its timeline
yeah that's my point. language isn't math, it changes over time organically and therefore is bound to have quirks. some of it is even inorganic, like when English linguists wanted to spell words of Latin origin in a way that reflects it.
the same one she takes? so not the one that asked him to name a handful of things that conveniently happened to be around him when he talked about it to the press?
if you put one magic mouse on top of the other you almost get something you can hold in your palm so yeah definitely
no no literally every other mouse manufacturer has got the shape of human hands wrong. you're probably holding it the wrong way. your hand has a design flaw.
—average fanboy
I'm much more in favor of never using his name just for the sole reason that he loves to see his name everywhere. plus we already have a word for his supporters; it's hogs.
well I can't find a source for it now. maybe I'm misremembering. I read it in the book The Universal History of Numbers by Georges Ifrah. maybe it was referring to some remnant exception, maybe it was about another language. can't verify it cause the book is not nearby right now. maybe I confused it with four different ways to pluralize in French (s, x, aux, none) idk.
1994 is as far in the past today as 1964 was in 1994.
maybe you misread my comment. I already said 1/10.
maybe I should have clarified: not every language has quirks in the same ways. German has weird articles that make no sense. French has different pluralization rules for up to four objects. e: this is probably wrong but there are many languages with different pluralizations for two objects (a dual) and for any number more than two. there are remnants of this in English as well, in words like both, either and neither.
But even of you just want to think about writing: German makes super long words that look monstrous by mushing words together. French doesn't pronounce half the letters in its spelling. Arabic doesn't really have vowels but instead uses diacritics that are often omitted so you have to be really familiar with the language to read at all.
meaningless publicity stunt? you know he's running for vice president, right? this is essentially a rally.
no it's not. you can find quirks like this in every language.
did you point out that you only voted with the condition that he was never supposed to have fun? maybe he missed that.
ah yes, madden players are famously kids.
they aren't streaming roblox. they're streaming madden because he pricks probably used to play it decades ago in between sessions of WoW.
this is what i mean by shit at writing.
this fails to be the point of the article unless the article is suggesting people are moving on to quick interactions because they are deliberately being moved away from longer articles by the authors that suggest these articles aren't worth their time... is the point of the article that longer content is belligerent and condescending?
I don't think it's actually getting any point across. it's just a boomer who thinks no one has anything better to do.
the first time I see it?
you think this is the first motherfucking gameplay video that I've seen from this motherfucking game in ten motherfucking years?
no one said anything about a time span to my liking.
either read the conversation you're trying to contribute to or just stop talking about irrelevant shit.
I'm asking for the plan.
#where's the plan, lebowski? where's the fucking plan?
valuing my time isn't lazy. if you can't summarize your post you're probably shit at writing and the article is not worth the time in the first place.