The ones based on religion aren't legitimate either.
27 2 ReplyIf its backed up by science then it wouldn’t be religious, mutual exclusivity there
10 5 ReplyNot eating pork or shellfish with food preservation techniques available 6,000 years ago is definitely backed by science
21 0 ReplyYeah, but outdated science doesn't count. That's just how science works.
Also, you don't have to be a scientist to avoid clearly spoiled seafood. Especially in the desert.
2 4 Reply
I hate homosapiens, they're bad for the planet.
5 0 ReplyThen you should support gay people, they’re less likely to procreate.
4 0 Reply
What is the perspective here? Did they discover a reason or does it not exist?
5 0 Replyit doesnt exist
2 1 Reply
It's an empirical, scientific fact that I am a homophobe. Take that! /s
3 0 ReplySome people don't trust others who like bitter stuff. I don't trust others who are into men. Even when they're women.
2 5 Reply