Three gaming-focused Linux operating systems beat Windows 11 in gaming benchmarks
Three gaming-focused Linux operating systems beat Windows 11 in gaming benchmarks
All three Linux distros managed to beat Windows 11 while using Vavle's Proton compatibility layer.
Nobara OS, Arch Linux and Pop!_OS beat Windows 11 by a slim margin in fps (delta 8) in Windows native games - Cyberpunk 2077, Forspoken, Starfield and The Talos Principle II. Windows 11 wins in Rachet & Clank.
ComputerBase's testing was done on an all-AMD test rig, featuring a Ryzen 7 5800X (non-3D) and a Radeon RX 6700 XT.
Update: Windows 11 wins in one game.
You're viewing a single thread.
Doesn't matter. Easy of use + compatibility trumps all.
Some people already using Linux as daily driver and booting to windows is not ease for them.
People doesn't need every games to be compatible. They only need the games they want to play compatible.
For me, I no longer need to boot into windows to play game.
Yes. That is the status quo.
I agree to an extent, but most games just work in Linux with no slowdowns or glitches. And I've had to mess with many games in Windows over the years to get them to run.
That's true, but also a W for Linux.
It's more: whatever comes preinstalled trumps all.
I don't agree whole heartedly, but I understand where you are coming from.
I recently installed Win11 for work related reasons. Not entirely happy with that, but keep learning or die. If I'm gonna have to support Win11, I should probably run it for a while, lol.
I will say it was nice to just install steam, vortex, download game and mods, and just play without any further tinkering required.
I'd love to see Linux have that sort of native support, not just from the gaming industry, but the community as well.
More like, "doesn't matter -- not being tracked > all." :^)
Even so, Linux is easier to use than Windows (yes, I went there.) because of a single and only fact:
Configuration files.
Does the average Windows user can configure EVERYTHING through a SINGLE configuration/text file, that explicitly says "what does what"? Video, sound, window size, hotkeys....?
No? So there you have it.
Linux is easier if you're already comfortable with a computer. A lot of users wouldn't understand how to edit a config file / would be uncomfortable doing so, especially those who grew up with modern phones and apps. Even if a 30 second edit took 30 minutes in a GUI, lots of people will prefer the GUI.
Unfortunately most people find Windows / MacOS "just works". If Linux was that easy, adoption would be higher. I love my Arch setup but the average user would probably find it unusable LOL
If Linux was that easy, adoption would be higher
People use what comes on the computer. OS usage on the Steam Deck is overwhelmingly Linux because that's what comes on it. This indicates that Linux is perfectly fine for the average person, it just needs to come pre-installed. Very few people install their own OS either way, Linux or Windows.
100% - I was thinking more about adoption for gaming in relation to the article (which I should have been clearer about), but pre-installation is the #1 reason for the lack of general adoption. But I think if the perception of Linux was a little less intimidating, and some aspects were easier (NVIDIA drivers, I'm looking at you LOL), I think people putting together a new PC would have a much more difficult choice to make when flashing the pen drive :P
Linux is easier if you're already comfortable with a computer.
This is completely false. Linux is just as approachable as Windows and is simpler and easier to use in many ways.
You're confusing "already learned Windows" with "easier".
I think 5 or 6 years ago, I would agree with this. But I'm not talking about being comfortable with Windows, I'm talking about computers as a whole - a lot of younger people have grown up on app-based devices like iPads, deeply entrenched in "ecosystems". I've found myself in situations where when working with people younger than myself, I regularly find myself having to explain things as mundane as how files work since they're used to things like Google Drive. Sure, if you took someone with no computer experience and put a Linux and a Windows machine in front of them? I'm sure both have a similar learning curve, and maybe an arguably easier one for Linux. But realistically, when growing up surrounded by devices is now the norm, we can't really ignore the prior experience.
This is true, and frankly a huge issue. It's ironic that right now "older generations" (like myself) know more about computers than younger ones. When I was growing up the widely accepted concept was that the younger generation was always going to do circles around the older ones when it comes to technical and computer concepts. You have no idea how many younger ones know nothing about computing. Like asking if a laptop with "8GB of memory is enough to store all their music". It's kind of alarming.
That's an incredibly wrong assessment. People don't use Linux because it's not pushed like drugs by hardware manufacturers. It's that simple. Linux is at a point where it's actually way easier to install, use and maintain than the 2 other major players out there. Add to this the diversity of DEs, ways to make things work, customization, etc.
No it's not. That's a flat out typical year of the Linux desktop mentality.
I have commits to TF and cncf. I ran lfs like 6 years ago. I use Windows DE because it's a far better experience now that WSL does 99% of what I need. Not because I'm uncomfortable in Linux.
There's nothing wrong with preferring the Windows workflow.
Windows has a configuration file, it's called a registry. Always has been.