I don't see the problem. It's A tree. It's not THE tree.
And has this guy never seen a chorse before?
(Okay, I got nothing after that one. Based on my limited knowledge of French, this is appears to be a terrible translation issue- tree = arbre, horse = cheval, house = maison.)
Before I zoomed in on the picture, my first thought is the letters supposed to represent their respective objects could have been in French words. A for arbre, b for balloon, and c for cheval.
Yup, the OOP is really just milking for social media likes by faking the post.
Yes, I had that thought too - as a learning tool/exercise for kids perhaps, but the use value would have been weird (in the sense that usually they well tell you to 'only speak that language' when you are learning it).
Picture translators add text boxes in another language on top of recognized text. They don't contain such artifacts and can be rendered at any resolution. These artifacts will only appear if output from a picture translator is processed further.