I think Mythbusters is a little bit of a different case than something more narrative. There are always new myths to bust; every generation needs something that makes science cool. I guess now that's a role mainly filled by various YouTubers.

"Replicate the circumstances, then replicate the results."

They apparently tried in 2017, with a new cast. It didn't really go anywhere, and only aired for two seasons. I think it's tough to recreate the magic of Hyneman & Savage, and they both seem to have moved on.

The mechanical action, not the content, is what's important. So you want something you'll be able to stay focused on (and not be bored by), but other than that it's not a huge deal.

Actually this could be a good opportunity. If there's something you want to learn really well—potentially even memorize parts of—writing it over and over is a good chance to do so.

That's a cue. A coup is a liquid dish, usually hot and savory, sometimes with chunks of meat, vegetables, and/or pasta.

Depending on where you're going, you may not need to worry about it much. When I was in postsecondary education, there wasn't much handwriting required. And I graduated 13 years ago; certainly things have gone more online since then. You might want to check with a current student in your field of study at your university and see what the handwriting requirements are. Make sure to ask whether cursive is a dealbreaker.

If it is something you're going to need to work on, there's really no getting around it: you're going to need to practice. Cursive or print, you're going to need to practice it. Get a big notebook, and something to write (hopefully something you're actually interested in), and just start writing. Transcribe a TV show as you're watching it. Copy a book line-for-line. You get good at the things you do a lot, and so you're going to have to write a lot.

Also, I would recommend slowing down. My handwriting is great when I'm writing slowly but can be terrible when I speed up if I don't pay attention. Slow down to start; if it's still not legible, slow down even more. Make sure you aren't practicing your existing bad habits. Then, as you practice, be deliberate: focus on each individual letterform, and as you become more comfortable writing legible letters, try to pick up the pace.

There are other things that you might find help you out: try practicing on wide-ruled paper, rather than college-ruled, for instance. Try a pencil or pen which moves more roughly across the page, for more tactile response. Make sure your pen or pencil is making strong, clear marks so that it's obvious what legibility issues are your hand (and not just a bad implement).

You can change your writing style; I have, on a couple of occasions. It just takes practice.

Also Mozilla.

Bro, obviously I have no idea what you're talking about. So either give me a link or shut up in an acknowledgement that you're trying to get me to admit something and you actually have no argument.

I'm not moving any goalposts at all. I'm expressing how inexperience and bad assumptions can make one's searching unfruitful through no fault of their own. That's all I've ever been saying.

Ah, you made an edit. Yeah, "kde login rotation" does, but "EndeavourOS login rotation" gives you no results mentioning SDDM. Giving people the benefit of the doubt costs you nothing over assuming that they're lazy, and the added bonus is that you don't sound like a jerk.

That's totally the biggest problem with the internet. And definitely deploying self-important moderaptors is the way to fix it.

/s, of course. Get off your high horse.

Yes. I would assume that the problem is in X11 or Wayland before thinking it could be SDDM, frankly. But even then, googling "Linux login screen" doesn't immediately reveal SDDM to be the point of concern.

Well, there was zero effort documented in the post.

You're not their teacher. It's not your job to decide how much effort they've put forth, or to grade whether or not that is sufficient.

Take a look at Ubuntu trying to teach newcomers how to ask a question.

And if they documented their research process, you'd say "tldr just ask the question." Stop trying to be paternalistic and gatekeepy. Just answer or don't.

I don't know about other people, but it's way easier to google something than to ask a question and then wait for the answer. I'm not OP, but if I've asked a question, it's only because I've exhausted my ability to find the answer on its own.

How do you think the OP is supposed to know that "SDDM" is the issue to look up? You don't get to enforce another person's effort. If all you want to provide is "you're looking for 'SDDM,' that would provide help and empower them without sounding like you're biting the newbie for not knowing everything.

Yeah, I have been. That's why I'm saying what I'm saying.

Do you think I'm someone else?

This sort of passive-aggressive "help" feels like a relic of the early 2010s we could do without.

How can I have contradicted myself when I haven't made a single assertion? I've literally only been asking you to explain your statement.

Prove...anything, honestly. Prove that I called anyone bad (I didn't, in any comment). Prove that there are mainstream leftists currently advocating for mass murder. Prove that you're not just making up everything you're saying based on "feels." Grow up? I'm not the one pretending that my opinions are more important than the facts.

Prove it. But first, answer my question. Trying to divert the conversation won't disguise the fact that you're making false equivalences based upon nothing.