Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
115 0 ReplyLudicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you're fooling us, but I'm not having NONE of it.
14 0 Reply
The reason is that we don’t need more. 1080p is what you can observe on a fullHD screen, so there is no need for more.
44 0 ReplyThe eye can't see past 1080p, clearly
12 1 Reply4k is a marketing scheme
2 0 Reply
1080p is enough for everyone
16 0 ReplyGoogle is getting better and better!!
9 0 ReplyWell have you counted them?
I don't seem to have any particles around here I do have an awful lot of stuff but no particles.
4 0 ReplyI started counting, but my 10-bit counter maxed out. My answer was quite close to Google's though 👍
2 0 Reply
Bad news for foxes.
5 0 ReplyLMFAO
4 0 ReplyA disturbing number of people trust this little and even cite it "according to google"
3 0 Reply