DJI claims the decision “aligns” with the FAA’s rules.
Summary
Chinese drone company DJI has removed its geofencing feature that automatically restricted drone flights over sensitive areas, like airports, wildfires, and government buildings, replacing it with dismissible warnings.
The decision follows growing distrust in Chinese-made drones and U.S. regulatory changes.
DJI argues this empowers operators while aligning with global standards, but critics worry it could endanger safety, particularly for unaware pilots.
Previously, geofencing helped prevent incidents, like a DJI drone crash at the White House in 2015.
The drones a terrorist would use to attack a government building doesn't even have GPS. They'd build racing drones, not use an off-the-shelf camera drone
Geo fencing is only one layer of defense. It's necessary and useful to some degree, but it should be a part of a whole system. It's place in the system is literally that of a fence.
The most sensitive places are going to need some active form of defense. There are fiber optic drones, good luck even trying to scramble them.
US drone manufacturers don't do this. DJI was going "above and beyond" here. And it is annoying to users because their fencing was broader than what the FAA allows.
This goes way beyond toys. Geofencing does things like stop people flying drones into nuclear power plants. The DJI Mavic can hold up to 30 kg. More than enough for a lot of explosive material.
If someone is going to fly explosives somewhere they will simply buy a drone that isn't DJI. It's not hard to get around the geofencing if you really want to.
The only benefits to the geofencing was to prevent people from flying around in areas they didn't bother to research and find out was actually somewhere they shouldn't be flying.