You mean the history books that will never, ever classify the Nazi slaughter in eastern Europe as colonialist, despite the fact that colonialist justification doesn't get more blatantly colonialist than "lebensraum"?
Or do you mean the history books that completely ignore the perfectly blatant fact that the wellsprings of fascism are all "western" (ie, white) countries that have deep histories of colonialist slaughter and exploitation?
Colonialism is the exploitation of people and of resources by a foreign group.
Lebensbraum means "living space." The Nazis didn't want to exploit the Slavs, they wanted to exterminate and replace them. Not colonialism.
blatant fact that the wellsprings of fascism are all “western” (ie, white) countries that have deep histories of colonialist slaughter and exploitation?
Italians weren't considered white until like 40 years ago and Germany famously didn't manifest any colonial holdings like other European countries.
Fascism is against your own people, colonialism is against other peoples. It's got nothing to do with skin colour, it just so happens that a lot of colonialism we learn about nowadays was done by western nations like the UK and US. Or would you argue Saddam Hussein wasn't a fascist? How about Plínio Salgado?
Oh yeah? Go ahead and elucidate how violence against a colonised people isn't exactly the same as violence against the outgroup of an established society. The point of both is subjugation and control. Twit.
I can only guess that the liberals on here are thoroughly invested in treating fascism and colonialism as some kind of "aberration," unfortunate oopsies, in their otherwise pristine concept of the liberal nation state.