You're viewing a single thread.
Ubuntu Repos: Sometimes runs out of food or accidentally spills two trays together
Fedora Repos: New plates every week
Debian Repos: Same 3 meals that are 5 star rated
Arch Repos: A machine gun that continuously fires pulverized food at your mouth
Manjaro repos: The Arch machine gun, but it keeps jamming.
LOL "every week"?!, those are rookie numbers. Fedora is the distro that finally satisfied my update fetish.
Debian Trixie has daily (even multiple times a day) updates currently.
I update every once in a while. Still need to figure out an update schedule that checks every few hours
You could install and configure the
unattended-upgradespackage to install updates in the background. I usually wouldn't recommend it on testing or unstable though. Works well on Debian stable since there's generally no breaking changes.Hadn't breaking changes for over half a year. Don't expect really bad ones. And if then I can uninstall the package
Is there Debian Starlight?
I don't understand
Reference to two MLP characters who are friends: Trixie and Starlight Glimmer
Nope, Debian releases are all named after Toy Story characters.
At least libaom(reference AV1 encoder) names all releases after MLP characters
I was going to say the same thing. Almost daily updates, and never a crash or a lockup after a new update.
I'm honestly surprised more people don't use Fedora. (I'm using the KDE spin in case that matters to anyone.)
I do believe fedora is not as beginner friendly as mint or ubuntu, mainly in installer, nvidia driver installation, and codecs. You also need a third party app (tweak) to manage startup applications.
There is also not enough resource about the distro, as most resource is written for ubuntu. This can be another point of frustration for beginners.
Also gnome store is super slow and refreshes a lot, which is not a great introduction to linux.
But I do believe it is a great distro for people's first distro-hop.
I don't mean to be argumentative, but I don't believe you're correct on several points.
For example, if you're using the KDE version you don't have to worry about the Gnome store being slow. And the KDE version comes with its own app for managing startup applications, so no third party app is needed.
As far as ease of use of install, as long as you're not trying to repartition drives and you're taking all the defaults it installs really easily, and all you have to do is click a checkbox for third party drivers and that gets the Nvidia and codecs stuff installed.
I too started on a Ubuntu and then moved over the Fedora, and it seems like it has much better hardware support, especially for older hardware. I don't know if that's just IBM's influence or what, as I don't track the day-to-day of the two different distributions.
I only update Arch before installing new software, or when there's a news item about something requiring manual intervention.
So about once a month.
Every update is basically a complete reinstall.Congratulation, you just invented atomic update.
Bro, what? You're doing something majorly wrong if everytime you update you have to treat it as a fresh install.
No no, it just installs the new packages and everything works. Takes a minute. What I meant is, it installs new versions for basically every installed package.
LFS: You are your own chef