Toño Estévez, presidente del Comité de Empresa de Mecalux-Esmena (Gijón): «La mejor herramienta para cortar este miedo es la unidad de la asamblea de trabajadores y la solidaridad» https://www.nuevo-rumbo.es/2024/06/25/tono-estevez-presidente-del-comite-de-empresa-de-mecalux-esmena-gijon-la-mejor-herramienta-para-cortar-este-miedo-es-la-unidad-de-la-asamblea-de-trabajadores-y-la-solidaridad/

@[email protected] @[email protected] @spanish @espanol @noticias @[email protected] @[email protected] @latino\_marxista @socialism @[email protected]

Suppose I have studied for years to become a pastry chef. I set up my own bakery, investing my time, energy, and labour into procuring equipment and building up a reputation as a delicious place to eat. I run the entire operation myself as the sole worker. Eventually, after years of turmoil, word of my exceptional pastries spreads and my bakery becomes the number one spot in town. Soon there's a line up around the block, long enough that I have to turn away customers on the regular.

Not wanting to have to send people home hungry, I decide that having someone to wash my dishes and somebody to tend to the counter would buy me enough time to focus on the main reason people come to my shop: my delicious pastries.

I do, however, have an issue. I worked really hard to build my bakery up to where it is today, and don't want to have to give up ownership to the two people I want to bring onboard. They didn't put in any effort into building up my bakery, so why should they have an equal democratic say over how it's run?

Is there a way I can bring on help without having to give away control of my buisness?

Furthermore, what's to stop the two new workers from democratically voting me out of the operation, keeping the store, name, brand, and equipment for themselves?

I made this community as a reaction to the July 4th general election taking place in the United Kingdoms, to mobilize my fellow comrades in the lead-up to the general elections, the group is party agnostic though there is an obvious bias due in part to my political affiliation but all leftest parties that fight for dignity and the working class are very much welcome.

By all means feel free to join where ever you may come from whether for information or solidarity.

In solidarity.

Squid.

Howdy! I'm new here and was hoping someone might have some insight to a question I've been thinking about for a while:

If I saved up my money and bought a tractor, would it be permissible/ethical to charge others to use it when I didn't need it?

This seems awfully similar to owning the means of production. What if I instead offered to plow their fields for them instead, driving the tractor myself and negotiating fair compensation in exchange?

Sorry if this is basic stuff I'm still learning. 🙏

I see many self-identified socialists imply that, in a socialist society, people would constantly be doing different jobs and would split their labour between many different jobs rather than specialize. It definitely makes sense when it comes to jobs that don't require too much specialization, but how does this work with highly specific jobs that require a disproportionately high amount of resources to become skilled in? Would they spend more time on a specialization, would they frequently rotate the same as everyone else?

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/14178982

> ! > > We are Leftypedia, a socialist and left-wing online encyclopedia. > > If you're a leftist of any kind or considering becoming one, you've probably found truthful information about socialist ideologies and movements from websites like Wikipedia lacking at best. > > These days, genuine leftist ideology can be hard to get into and learn about, between the toxic culture that dominates online leftist spaces and the many issues faced by even offline socialist organizations. Reading theory-dense works from Marx can be hard at first, and the easily-accessible guides targeted at beginners often don't even understand the work their talking about themselves! > > So, what's the solution? > > A dedicated socialist resource, like Leftypedia. > > We aspire for new leftists to be given an environment where original discourse is encouraged on top of sourced and informative encyclopedic articles > > Since are beginning in 2019, we have hundreds of articles, dozens of editors, and a growing community and base of content. > > We're well on our way of reaching our goals, and welcome any leftist or incoming-leftist to view and editor our articles, carry out original discourse, and so on! > > Our Discord server > > Our Matrix space > > Questions about us? Feel free to ask them here or on the links provided above!

I am genuinely interested how such a thing would be done. I understand that it wouldn't be as hard as with communism, but I can't think of any way to encourage companies to make better (genuinely better) products. I remember how my mother told me how in her days (she lived in the DDR) there wasn't really any reason to be better than another company, as they would all be payed equally.

I wasted way too much time arguing with liberals on the internet and I just need to vent my frustrations. They turned inaction into a virtue: they call it "pragmatism". Vote for Biden, don't question the genocide. They reject the "idealism" of action, critique or even the simple act of imagining the alternative. They consider themselves to be the adults in the room while they are nothing more than reactionaries themselves enabling the worst perversions of this capitalist-realist system.

It's so frustrating to see this, to see their smug self-sanctification when they just follow the line of the least resistance, when all the effort they put is into retaining their own comfort. They talk about "saving democracy" while attempting to squash any dissent, while being hostile to any alternative that is not a liberal democracy.

They react violently to anything that could imaginably threaten the system exactly because they are comfortable in it. They know that they sit atop the piles of corpses of those murdered for their baubles, the oil for their cars and gas for heating their suburban homes. And they find it unimaginable to ever sacrifice even the smallest of those comforts.

They wear slogans of human rights on their chests but whenever it's the time to walk the walk, they melt into the thin air, always finding an excuse why it's not the right time. Why Biden can actually violate the Geneva Convention, why all they can do in a face of the genocide is to shrug.

As it goes in Disco Elysium:

"KINGDOM OF CONSCIENCE – Moralists don't really have beliefs. Sometimes they stumble on one, like on a child's toy left on the carpet. The toy must be put away immediately. And the child reprimanded. Centrism isn't change -- not even incremental change. It is control. Over yourself and the world. Exercise it. Look up at the sky, at the dark shapes of Coalition airships hanging there. Ask yourself: is there something sinister in moralism? And then answer: no. God is in his heaven. Everything is normal on Earth."

I would like to preface by saying I am very sorry if this is the wrong community. This post touches on the core philosophy of Marxism, and I was hoping to get some insight.

My friend claims that the only reason companies produce things is because the working class, regular citizens, are asking for it; he does not get behind the idea of companies subconsciously persuading people to buy the items they sell. He believes that because your regular person wants a new phone, kitchen equipment, clothes, whatever - they are pushing capitalism forward and therefore it is the right / natural system.

How would you reason? I feel conflicted. On one hand, people do want things and there is almost always something to produce it for them, but on the other hand companies are steadily pushing for profit, using various tactics to drive consumerism. I would appreciate what you guys think and what you would answer, because according to him, capitalism only exists because demand exists. Whether that's true or not, I hope we can discuss. Cheers!

I asked this same question on 3 different instances and render the same result

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/12656737

Edit:

• replaced YT link with Timestamp to start at: [4:07:21] Short Introduction of Participants
  • Was: https://youtu.be/RfnPgbC0CYQ updated to: https://youtu.be/RfnPgbC0CYQ&t=14841

> >Free and Equal Elections 2024 Presidential Debate Series #2 > > >Featuring Presidential Candidates: > >- Jill Stein > >- Jasmine Sherman > >- Claudia De La Cruz > >- Chase Oliver > >- Lars Mapstead > > >MODERATED BY: CHRISTINA TOBIN, JASON PALMER AND CAITLIN SINCLAIR > > >Brought to you by Free & Equal, an organization dedicated to hosting presidential debates for over 15 years, this event is a cornerstone of our commitment to fostering an informed electorate. > > >The FEBRUARY 29TH Debate criteria encompassed all candidates on the ballot in at least four states. > > >You have the power to decide who takes the stage at the next Free and Equal Elections debate! Six U.S. Presidential candidates from various parties will participate, chosen by you through ranked-choice voting. > > Timestamps: > - [3:58:24] National Anthem (Song) > - [4:03:20] Host starts talking > - [4:07:21] Short Introduction of Participants > - [4:08:30] Lars Mapstead (Libertarian Party) > - [4:10:44] Claudia De La Cruz (Party for Socialism and Liberation) > - [4:12:52] Jill Stein (Green Party) > - [4:15:07] Jasmine Sherman (Green Party) > - [4:17:30] Chase Oliver (Libertarian Party) > - [4:19:56] Question 1: Immigration > - [4:31:25] Question 2: Criminal Justice Reform > - [4:45:42] Question 3 (from the Public): Tribal Nations/Indigenous Reservation/Return Land/Enforcement > - [4:58:13] Question 4: Environmental Policy > - [5:14:47] Question 5: Economic Policy > - [5:29:19] Question 6: National Unity > - [5:53:27] Closing Remarks by hosts

A very simple test of basic morality and ethics. If you think badly of comrade Aaron Bushnell in any way, you are the bad guy, end of story.

That is all.

From the Washington Post:

ASHEVILLE, N.C. — When the managers of a small bookstore in this Appalachian mountain town received a call from a distributor wondering if they could take in 22,000 books rejected by a Florida school district, it felt like a colossal ask.

Firestorm Books usually stocks fewer than 8,000 books — titles that range from historical fiction to solarpunk. The self-described queer feminist collective wasn’t sure where they’d put them, and their customers typically weren’t looking for picture books.

“We were like, this feels like a bigger thing than we can manage,” said Libertie Valance, a managing member of the group that runs the store. “But I think even in that conversation, there was an acknowledgment that we were going to do it.”

And so began the journey to bring eight tons of books — most of them banned under Florida’s state laws restricting classroom discussion on race, gender identity and sexual orientation — from Duval County Public Schools in Jacksonville to left-leaning Asheville.

Alt text: a screenshot of "Slow Down" written by Kohei Saito

Midwestern Marx YouTube interview: Gabriel Rockhill | Why Slavoj Žižek is Capitalism's Court Jester

Marx and Engels mention a class "below" the proletariat called the lumpenproletariat, which i understand as meaning a class that has no class consciousness, and is therefore susceptible to the influence of the bourgeoisie. but i don't see the difference between that and the proletariat proper. don't the proletariat receive propaganda to suppress their own class consciousness, and don't they have to be woken up? i don't get why the lumpenproletariat supposedly can't be woken up in the same way. besides, some examples of the lumpenproletariat given are people in organized crime, sex workers, and the unemployed. i find it hypocritical to condemn a class of people based on what they do to survive in a capitalist society (or in the case of the unemployed, the fact that the bourgeoisie won't give them a job). but more than anything, i'm just thoroughly confused by this concept. i feel like i'm missing something major.

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/6182063

The focus of this article is on anarchist movements, but it contains some timely reflections on the dynamics of revolutionary movements and the tension between "Leninist" organizational strategies and "horizontalist", anarchist-informed approaches.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/11206898

> cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/11206849 > > > cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/11206822 > > > > > Mr. Stalin said people of “Hindi-speaking States underwent untold miseries” during the pandemic as they could not get “transport facilities to return to their hometowns.” “We had shed tears for them. They walked hundreds of kilometres. Some of them were even crushed by trains. If something is more dangerous than the Corona (virus), it is the BJP government. Now the government is trying to divert people’s attention by consecrating the Ram temple,” he said. > > > > > > Recalling a viral video in which a Hindi-speaking boy demanded “education over temple”, the Chief Minister said the BJP government was particular that “people should not gain awareness”. “The people of north India are no longer ready to believe the politics of the BJP. It cannot win in northern States in the forthcoming Lok Sabha polls,” Mr. Stalin said.

Subhas Chandra Bose was a left-wing nationalist, and a freedom fighter for the cause of Indian independence. He is the founder of the All India Forward Bloc. He was also the leader of the Indian National Army, a rebel group that was against British colonialism. Sadly, just like Bhagat Singh, who was another leftist revolutionary, in today's time, his anti-colonial nationalism is used as an excuse to appropriate him as a Hindutva fascist icon.

I was wondering if there are instances where the fascist were banished, without having to rely on foreign army? For example, hijacking the fascist party with leftist sympathizers, or indirectly threatening the stability of the government by using fascist-handbook reactionary provocations? Or something like using economic arms to crush fascism?

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/9890596

> Check out c/breadtube for more left video content and discussion. > - BreadTube > - [email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/9628002

> Check out c/breadtube for more left video content and discussion. > - BreadTube > - [email protected]