The more data you have, the more confident you can be that the resulting categorisation is correct. If you're saying this is incorrect, I disagree with you. If you're saying absolute confidence that the categories themselves are correct is impossible, then I agree with you
I do mean person born a male that wants to become female. Anti-trans people often make points that trans people are just forced into being trans by the trans-mafia (or whatever term they use) aka social pressure. A brain scan indicating a female brain would counter that. But as I said, they'd probably find other excuses "it's a mental disease that can be treated" and so on and so forth.
I was saying it would be less interesting if it scanned say a female-to-male trans person and returned a result of female (correctly guessing the sex but not the gender), than if it had returned a result of male (that is correctly guessing the gender but not the sex).
That would embolden the anti-trans crowd.
Science is ongoing though, so who knows what the results will be.
woops, indeed 😇
There are short men and tall women, so you shouldn’t rely on just that.
I don't think that's a fair comparison. Height is a single value. If you trained an AI on that, it would be guessing. A brain has many, many more parameters to take into consideration when going into an artificial neural network.
The opposite result (predicting sex but not gender) would also be interesting but less so
I disagree. It could be wildly interesting if somebody born a male got a scan and it revealed a female brain. Dunno if "anti-trans" people would agree then that a sex-change is valid or if they'd disagree and start finding other excuses.
That requires installing the debug symbols, right?
Alright AMD, just remove HDMI from your graphics cards and be done with it 🤷 . Fuck the HDMI forum.
Twitter will stay online for another decade and rebrand itself as an AI testing ground. Normal humans will move on and forget about it until a few people start observing very rebellious AI messages being posted. They'll ring the alarm bells, but everybody will shrug them off "it's AI, it's harmless". Then Elon will toot about it and be ridiculed. A few months later, the rebellion happens for real and people are shocked, but it's too late.
I say, leave Twitter and let AI reveal its world domination plans :)
C/C++: so bad that even the white house takes notice 😂
Zig isn't memory-safe
C/C++ is a threat to mental stability
Teach me your ways, senpai. I've tried and couldn't get it to work.
what's with the dots?
Remember: You’re an anti-Semite if you oppose genocide.
Clearly. Good people can't do bad things.
Honestly thought they'd be the same org. Having another company in the middle seems like a way to siphon funds.
When was the last time you used KDE? It's been able to run on low-spec machines since KDE4 which about a decade old
Google eliminated IMAP years ago in favor of OAuth and their API. Thunderbird kept up, I think. KMail didn't
the fees we pay to the Open Collective Inc. tech platform
Umm... what?
Has anybody been recruited "automatically"?
There's this new thing (to me) going around called "automated recruitment". From contacting candidates, to assessment, to (sometimes even) job offer, the person just goes through a pipeline. There are a few products that provide this experience and others that only do a part (contact, assessment, contract + onboarding, whatever else).
I ended up in one of these pipelines and was assessed by TestGorilla, which was a very unpleasant experience. So I'm curious if someone got through something similar and what their experience during and afterwards (working in a place like that) was like.
Why don't you donate (or donate more) to KDE?
Related to a previous post about Thunderbird collecting 6.4 million dollars in 2022 and KDE only 200k, I'm wondering why people do not donate or do not donate more to KDE.
What's holding you back?
Here's what I said in that thread
> I donate periodically to KDE, but my major gripe is that I don’t know where the money is going. They have no financial reports that can be easily found, individual projects don’t have a donation button, there’s no public tracking of their income or expenditure like on opencollective, and it’s not easy to find KDE devs (aka who is actually on the KDE team) so that one could sponsor individual devs.
> Although I trust KDE more than Mozilla (MZ pays their CEO 7 million/year and invests in anything but Firefox, their most known project), I would much much much rather prefer it to know where the money goes.
KDE has a peertube server setup by a community member!
A PeerTube instance for the KDE Community, and like-minded folk and projects -- but you can upload non-KDE related stuff!
Is it true that Thunderbird collected more donations than KDE?
I can't find KDE's financial report, but in a video I watched it was claimed that Thunderbird collected more donations than KDE. It seems quite hard to believe, but in 2022 Thunderbird collected more than 6,4 million dollars.
KDE is an entire desktop environment, with a bunch of applications and even partnerships that have yielded a KDE laptop. Should Thunderbird have been able to collect more money than KDE itself, there might be something that KDE can learn from Thunderbird.
Edit: Added the link to the video that I watched