whilst

Ew.

Don't forget about the children.

Project much?

Ah, yes, the ironclad and inviolate distinction between the person and the presidency. How very reassuring that no one in history has ever let their personal interests unduly bias their obligations of office. Whew.

Not this citizen here, though. This "tal" is a real patriot, sharing half-assed hopium around like smearing shit on his teeth and grinning at us all. 🤦🏼

So, basically, they're not saying anything worthy of a headline, much less a whole article. Thanks for letting us know... smdh.

/The Satanic Temple has entered the chat

So, Gizmodo's trying to toady up to The Onion, now?

jimmies rustled

According to whom, and where's the unbiased data? GTFO with this astroturfing bullshit.

What a load of shit, ha!

Because, as I've already stated above: Heaven's existence is inherently predicated on the knowledge of "sin", and therefore a soul-themed credit score. Rhymes with "karma", maybe. Who knows? Any way you spice it, credit makes heaven — that is, if innumerable denominations, et al, are any proof of. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Do we have a 'best of' around here yet? 'Cause, damn. I'm in.

Not to mention that those tryhards going full weeboo on gatekeeping are ignoring various other "heretical" facts of sushi's founding people, like: it's fine to add just about anything you feel like to it. Oh, is krab™ in poor taste? What about ice cream? Snack chips? I mean, FFS, the Japanese have built a global reputation for taking a concept and improving on its efficiency or efficacy or both, all the while these scrote-bearded trogs are pinching their puds to dreams of katanas and isekai redemption. 🤪

Username checks out.

You know it does. Where do you think "virginity" was invented? Hell is where the parties're at and there's no inherent need for a currency system in that dynamic. Heaven, on the other hand, is founded on an imaginary and largely arbitrary credit system. Ergo, money exists there.

Please, don't call it that. It was, yes, technically "the president" at the time, but we don't have to call it that anymore, or ever again — even when referring to that (not brief enough) period in history.

Poor plants.

"Both", "plenty", "guarantee", etc.

I'm getting the impression you have barely a passing understanding of what these words actually mean.

Ah, how the turn tables.