There's no hard line between "not enough" and "enough". More is always better. It's just a question of whether the gains are worth the effort.

Consider Maslow's hierarchy of needs. If we say that being able to satisfy physiological needs is "enough", you still need to ask: with that probability and for what duration of time? Nothing is guaranteed in life, but as you gain more money, you get asymptotically closer to that 100% probability of satisfying all physiological needs for the duration of a human lifetime. What if you want to provide this guarantee for your children? Your extended family? Your local community? Then you'll need even more.

Let's say you've satisfied all levels of needs but the last one: self-actualization. That final level can be a huge money sink. Are you an artist that wants to express your idea exactly as they appear in your mind? You'll need a lot of resources to acquire relevant material, or to pay others to work with you on these projects. Are you a scientist who's interested in fundamental research and gaining a better understanding of the universe? Again, you need lots of money for your scientific equipment and for paying other people to help you.

Then you look at how hard it is to acquire more money. If you're out doing a 9-5 every day and getting paid hourly for your work, that's a high effort. You probably wouldn't want to keep doing that if you know with 95% certainty that you have enough money to survive your remaining days. Now think about someone taking a bribe. In many cases, it's extremely low effort. You're already working your 9-5 anyway, but someone is now paying you extra to not do your job? Win-win. What about ad reads? Again, you're already working in front of the camera anyway. This is just a question of what you do in front of said camera. Ad reads are probably one of the easiest options, no matter how questionable the product is.

What each person wants out of life is going to be very different from one another. Maybe you only care about having enough to take care of yourself, but someone else may need to care for many other people. One person may be okay with a quiet carefree life, another wants to fix all the problems they find, and another wants to enjoy all the luxuries life has to offer. How far you go is largely dependent on the effort required to get there.

I may have been too autistic for this. I don't think I had any understanding of what masculine/feminine even meant until my mid 20s.

I

A

U

How would you interpret it if you're neutral towards the idea? Like, it would be an inconvenience to have to learn how to handle new bits, but otherwise, life just goes on as usual.

Yeah, the privatization is the issue. The state should be directly paying for maintenance of the facilities so there's no incentive to have more prisoners. Profit shouldn't be part of the equation at all.

It would be good to have a place to discuss the merits of different systems. If you want to make a change, the bulk of your efforts are going to be in breaking out of the FPTP system, and that doesn't change regardless of which voting system you support.

It can be either or neither. Context dependent. Although I'm having a hard time coming up with a scenario where being "cool" is affected by drug consumption in any way.

The French understood this. That's why they call it "pain".

Spotify lyrics are synced. You also click any text in the lyrics and it'll jump to that part of the song.

Are you pressing hard enough on the strings?

Is this a problem even if you're just playing that one string?

Feel free to share a recording of it. Might help to diagnose the issue.

The peer review process is way too noisy to be meaningful. Better to just read it and judge the work for yourself.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02528

Or wait for follow up work that can corroborate their claims.

Is this meant for a particular country, or just RCV discussion in general?

It doesn't become your livelihood and life until you've gone through the effort of learning it

Impossible in what sense?

Just a guess, but I think if your eyes try to focus on something and it improves the image clarity (e.g. using glasses that don't fit your eyes), then it'll keep trying and end up causing problems. If attempts at focusing have no effect (e.g. looking at blurry images), then it'll stop trying and your eyes can properly relax.

With notifications going to the OP?

You mean, a vending machine?

The world isn't going to be uninhabitable within our lifetimes either. Doesn't mean we don't have a responsibility towards future generations in making sure we head in the right direction.