Nah. Time to reread, sodium is absolutely a viable tech now.
Telling me I'd like to watch it all burn, and then calling me a political pacifist in the next breath? Come on, now, you can do better.
The debt isn't an abstract thing that can be unilaterally printed away. It has real-world consequences, real-world resources that can't be ignored, and that the US isn't even in a position to come out on top of once it comes calling.
I'm glad you're fighting that political fight. It keeps you occupied, and keeps them occupied. Like a pair of dysfunctional lovers, you deserve each other. I'm watching, and I'm learning. I know how to take advantage of the mistakes you make, and ones they make, and use them to my own personal advantage, as well as to the advantage of other moderate folks that I'm perfectly willing to give business preference to, and reach out for, and go the extra mile for.
..just.. ..keep fighting, bud. It'll end soon enough. ..and certainly, you will win. Perhaps not like you think, though.
The debt is going to come calling, and I'm sure you'll blame Republicans, and I'm sure they'll blame you.
Perhaps I'll have my place self-sustaining by then, perhaps not. But I'll be sure to keep plenty of popcorn stocked.
Nah. Both sides are off their rockers. Absolute fucking nutters. One's just more violent. But neither can be trusted with any kind of control over others.
Your options are "grow" or "repeat". Unfortunately, you're the one most equipped to take responsibility for your own life, but you evolved into this situation, and evolution is messy. It's not your fault, bit it's your responsibility.
Accepting those things deeply enough, and what they mean personally, changes everything.
It's kinda funny how fanatically people point out that it's the other side that's the problem.
I'm glad there's someone else out there with the same concerns.
I'd be more glad if unknowns and inconsistencies were frankly acknowledged. Even though in some senses Feynman contributed to the metaphorical tech debt, one of the things I love about his lectures is his frankness in regard to the (then) current state of knowledge, and about how much was simply unknown. Much of that is still unknown, and there are major glaring inconsistencies that are handwaved into oblivion.
To be clear, this is not an "anti-science" comment, but rather a desire to see the institution of science become more consistent, and to address unknowns honestly.
The state cannot have been absolutely static - if it was, the big bang would not have occurred, and the same stasis would be existing now, unchanged.
shrug it's a post currently showing up in "all".
Go ahead and get another last word in if you like - you're arguing with your own ghosts, mostly. Have a good night.
Pretty clear that's the case here in the comments on this post.
They are, in accordance with the teachings of Jim the Stegosaurus.
I don't have a horse in this race, but man, let it drop. The person who's fighting for ridiculous improbabilities here is you. Nobody you're arguing with in this thread is even making a claim that Magic Jesus existed. Just that the man named Jesus who is talked about by the early Christians likely existed (which is scholarly consensus, not even a niche claim). They're specifically not claiming that the fantastical claims made by the early Christians about that man are true.
I don't hate because someone told me to, i just hate because i hate.