It only knows bbc.com, because .co.uk is too non-American for it. Perfect for a world news com.

When OS X was released, half the point was that they were now a compatible Unix system using interoperable standards.

This is your brain on Zionist propaganda lol

lol the Israeli occupation will attack and kill anyone if they want to steal their land. The peace deals mean nothing to them.

Technically I think North Korea is at war with the US, not South Korea. To declare war against South Korea would imply they believe there is a legitimate government to declare war against, whereas I believe they just view it as an American occupation.

Is Jordan, Egypt, or Syria next?

Because the goal is to remove Palestinians from their land by any means necessary. In practice, that means genocide.

You can request it but no manufacturer is going to give it to you, nor would they have any obligation to.

The architecture being open source or not has nothing to do with security. All high performance risc-v cpu designs are proprietary. The instruction set itself is open source, but beyond that you have as much visibility into the internals of the processor as you would with an Intel one. The only thing the license impacts is that you can legally make your own risc-v processor if you want, whereas tou can’t make your own x86 processor if you want (legally).

UEFI exists on arm and windows on arm devices can boot other OSes through it just like on x86.

Personally if I ever decide to host an instance I would prefer to do it on aarch64.

On cable it’s because they allocate significantly more bandwidth towards download than upload. They could allocate them equally but most customers that are mostly just streaming or playing games care only about the download since it means they can stream/download things faster.

The US providing this defense however allows Israel to be even more belligerent without fear of retaliation, possibly the only thing stopping them from expanding their genocide faster.

If it’s anything like ChromeOS, it’ll be a VM where you can do whatever you want, within that VM.

Your default types for that are i32 or u32. It’s the exact same number of characters yet encodes more precise information.

I’m aware of packing, but for my specific niche the main bottleneck is CPU, and it’s important to minimize the amount of memory usage to improve data locality, increasing cache hit rates, ultimately increasing cpu throughout. Any gains we would make by packing such small values would likely be eliminated by the cost of unpacking them, unless it’s a flags-like value where we are primarily comparing individual bits.

I’ll be honest if that’s your complaint, I have a hard time believing you would find the equivalent C or C++ code to be better.

Cargo being an all-in-one tool is actually one of my favorite things about the rust ecosystem. It’s many things, and it does it all seamlessly.

Regarding comparing to C or C++, how can you argue either is designed better? C, while standing the test of time, predates so many modern programming concepts or standards and writing C code is extremely error prone. C++ improves on many of C’s shortfalls, but it wasn’t designed. It’s the result of different things being loosely bolted on to C over the course of 30 years. And it’s still error prone, for example while there are smart pointers and other types that can make writing memory safe code possible, they’re not default and they aren’t always fully supported in the standard library, let alone anything else.

I do systems programming work, sometimes with constrained memory scenarios. We always want to use the smallest types we can for any task, and unless negative numbers are a necessary, always prefer unsigned. That means a lot of u8 and u16 unless we know a value is likely to need more bits to be represented. Probably doesn’t matter as much in we programming but that’s not Rust’s niche (or well not its original niche).

It does define minimum sizes for different types. An int for example is at least two bytes, whatever size those might be!

I don’t believe so, I think it is chrome and edge only (besides safari of course). You could still manually copy-paste the passwords but of course that’s not as convenient.