A scant couple hundred thousand more brain cells and we'll be there.

Cheap shot, I've never dared a soap opera myself.

Nah nah, the ruling applies to all presidents, see?

King President

Murderbot.

Murrrderbooooot.

800,000 brain cells played pong.

Creepy.

That's murderbot's ancestor.

Holy cow, those look great.

Great!

My brain was primed by identifying cinnamon buns, but then I found out they're pizza and now all bets are off!

I can tell you're serious, that's why it's such a bummer you can't make any headway.

You seem so earnest but have all these assumptions you keep tripping over that facilitate you shooting yourself in the foot.

You constantly have to revise and change your "quotes", guidelines and arguments to eke out over more flailing attempts where you swear, you swear, this one example will really shiw that kurzweil was in fact not one hundred percent correct on every prediction(which nobody is trying to prove).

You want to change your criteria further to secure a half point I've already given you hair a dozen comments ago since AR was available but wasn't mainstream, you go for it.

Dither all you like, it's not changing the overall score of kurzweil predictions being largely correct.

Shoot, doesn't even affect how overwhelmingly correct the predictions are on your "special rules" with the wrong dates list.

Definitely doesn't affect my original argument that kurzweil was correct about "tons of his predictions".

I had no idea kurzweil was over 80% correct though even narrowly as you're interpreting them, so thanks.

I personally used ar glasses with greyed lenses, a projected miniature computer screen and a backpack just like those, so you won't be convincing me any time soon that ar tech didn't exist in the 2000s.

You want to change your definition further to secure a half point I've already given you since arc tech was actually but wasn't mainstream, you go for it.

Dither all you like, it's not changing the overall score of his predictions being largely correct.

Shoot, doesn't even affect how overwhelmingly correct the predictions are on your "special rules" with the wrong dates list.

Again, kurzweil made those predictions before 1999, but who's counting? Not you.

He didn't make your rules for you, you're just upset that he was correct so you're trying and failing to rebut him.

It's hilarious that you can't do it.

I actually thought you'd have a much higher success rate than this, but even by your own metrics he's still above 80% just within that one book.

Here's an example of a prediction, since you're having so much trouble.

"Multiple electric cars with airless tires will be sold commercially by 2035".

See that?

It's a scenario that doesn't exist yet that we are pre-dic-ting (imagining the future!) will happen later on.

No, I'm sure you'll find one eventually.

Won't really tip the overwhelming correct predictions kurzweil has, but why don't you try again?

Love to see it.

Here's another of those consequences people are having difficulty recognizing

I agree, you should definitely be medicated.

Jackson added, for sure.

Kagan no way.

Kagan has sided with conservatives way too many times with the "look, their conclusion is poorly reasoned and unconstitutional, but you can technically get to the conclusion constitutionally from a liberal perspective if..." and then she sides with the conservatives.

Poking around in legal details can be fun, but she can be a professor while we get someone taking action on the court instead of siding with employer-imposed religious mandates over employee bodily autonomy (hobby lobby), supporting the "Muslim ban"(trump via Hawaii), and crippling contract law so that class action lawsuits can't be brought against corporations over faulty or illegal contracts. (American Express versus Italian colors).

Kagan is not helping people, get someone on there who wants to help people.

You don't like it when people contradict your false statements with the truth?

Shocking.

Unfortunately, some of us know what we're talking about and don't need to make up the fictions you need to.

Biden is doing the specific work you're throwing a tantrum about.

Happy to rain on your fantasy.

Wow, how did you manage that deduction?

Oh you mean like every other us president for 70 years?

Except that Biden actually paused military aid imposed sanctions and stood up to Israel?

The first us president to do any of those things.

Fascinating.

Wanna go ahead and count how many people voted?

What do you like about genocide?

Specifically

Time to legally immediately replace every Justice except for Sotomayor and Jackson.

See what you're talking about is every single other president in US history.

What I'm talking about is Biden taking direct action by sanctioning, contradicting and pausing weapon shipments to Israel.

You made a whoopsie there. Confusing one person with every other person in the group.