Whenever I have heard stories like that it was human review of content that was already reported by users, which is the practice I am criticizing google for. Watching a curated list of abusive content will do that.
What I am describing is human review of every ad on the platform. There are very few mental health issues when the bad content is the vast minority.
It says (parody) in the name.
This is twitter, because elon lacks reading comprehension, so the rules require parody to be clearly marked.
Google does not review advertisements. If you pay google for an ad, they do not verify it, they don't check it, they just blindly publish it to their ad network.
They rely on user reports, after the content is shown. As a result, google has no way to prevent this. Any objectionable or maicious content will be shown to users before anything can be done about it.
The solution to this is simple, have a human watch and approve the ad before it goes live. But google will never do this.
Those are colony insects that have a cooperative survival strategy. Japanese beetles don't do that as far as I'm aware.
Let's all sing the 2024 politics song!
👏 anyone 👏 who 👏 disagrees 👏 with 👏 me 👏 is russian 👏 or 👏 chinese 👏
Always remember, there is no such thing as a differing opinion.
Pledging to vote for someone despite the genocide means they have no incentive to stop the genocide. That is the more dangerous stance.
Ballots are secret. There is no way to prove how you voted once the ballot is sumbmitted. The optimal play is to make a lot of noise saying that your vote is contingent on an end to the genocide, even if that isn't how you actually vote on election day.
Pledging to vote for biden at this point is encouragement. Why would he do anything about palestine if he knows you're going to vote for him anyway?
I appreciate the recommendation, that sounds like a fun community!
No... That's why I want biden to step down.
If any democrats want my vote they have to replace biden.
Isn't a crash screen the last place you should your branding?
They want to advertise a $2 chicken box without actually selling chicken for $2.
What even is the point of this debate? They've both had a term in office. We know how both of them actually govern the actual country. What can this debate possibly convey that the past 8 years of governance hasn't?
I bought an old business monochrome laser printer ten years ago. Still hasn't needed a new toner cartridge.
The piano for when dodecaphony doesn't subvert tonality nearly enough.
Under because that way you can model it by making a cylinder and adding a plane to it, because the plane is attached to the back you don't have to do the extra work of making sure the textures line up.
You actually can run the engines in reverse. They have thrust reversers. There's very good reasons that they do not reverse the plane from the stand using the engines, but it is possible.
If they made you forget, why would they admit to it on a sign? Does that make any sense whatsoever?