I'm guessing this will pass bipartisan, since both dems and republicans could do more central planning around what people consume then. Dems would want to use it to increase sustainability in consumption and both parties will want to push more American manufacturing (or at least non-Chinese).

Also one great side effect might be that people will rely more on local black markets for necessities, this increasing community cohesion and sustainability.

lmao, it'll do literally the opposite

I think I'm gonna wait for the 10.10.10 release until I upgrade

this meme was last true 20 years ago

Bognate

Yup, I always wonder why phones don't have camera covers built in, like modern laptops do. Rethorically speaking.. I know why they don't.

You could probably build a live mm resolution 3D map of every large city with all those smartphone cameras.

it's a crime against humanity that snow monkey human hybrids don't exist yet

If it were up to me, I'd regulate these into high hell.

1. Mandatory camera covers
2. Mandatory really obvious recording lights, recording sounds
3. Auto-removing anyone from the camera feed that hasn't explicitly agreed to appear on your camera. And replacing them with a black box.
4. Geofencing to disable the camera near any place that hasn't explicitly opted-in, as well as removing the place from a recording at any distance.

All as tamper proof hardware features. And make it a felony to modify them to remove these safeguards.

Too hard to implement? Good

I would love it, if AI was only used for useful things, like translation, spelling correction, sorting my photos, Plant/Object ID, actual useful SST, doing Google's old job of actually finding the information I want in the sea of SEO garbage or badly written product descriptions.

But no, I already know it'll primarily be used to spy on you better while draining your battery. At least with all the past spying you knew the data processing isn't THAT advanced. But with AI it'll be like having a literal spy following you around at all times.

And from the state of existing models that are small enough to run on a phone, it'll still be years until they are actually reliable enough to be useful.

wow I just remembered that they exist for the first time in 80 years

they'll absolutely dominate with their nanosuits

John McAfee and Terry A. Davis teamed up to finally take them down

Except for maybe their charging network, range and self driving, their cars are absolute shit. I don't understand why their valuation is so high now that there is so much competition.

they are boring, ugly, badly made, expensive, horrible interior design, everything is propietary garbage, everything is stuffed with unnecessary chips (why do you need 4 chips for a door handle?) or garbage software.

We'll see how they fare with cheap Chinese cars flooding the market at half the price for the same features. Jk they'll be banned because of legal corruption.

planetary protection is a joke

pre arab Morocco was a real interesting place

minimum age should be 250

It is kind of interesting how open machine learning already is without much explicit advocacy for it.

It's the only field I can think of where the open version is just a few months behind SOTA in all of IT.

Open training pipelines and open data are the only aspects that could still use improvements in ML, but there are plenty of projects that are near-SOTA and fully open.

ML is extremely open compared to consumer mobile or desktop apps that are always ~10 years behind SOTA

Das schlimmste was du ihnen antun kannst, ist die Nummer an die zuständige Behörde/effektivste Organisation zu melden mit so viel Details wie möglich.

as a punishment we should put them in tiny cardboard or oncrete boxes in a sea of boxes that are a two hour's drive away from their workplace and they also won't get any ammenities. then we make them pay it off over 60 years living paycheck to paycheck doing the most miserable and soulless jobs we can find.

bwahahaha wouldn't that be evil!

I regretfully know that woman