As I understand it, it's basically trying to answer the following question: What if we could start over and use existing building blocks to make a simple yet complete system using the Linux kernel? All changes have been made in accordance to that basic premise. From replacing GNU in GNU/Linux with BSD, to choosing dinit over systemd as init system.
I hope they succeed (as long as it’s not immutable)
Are you one of those with a raging hateboner towards everything immutable? I ask this as I don't see any reason to bring this up in the first place.
FWIW, I absolutely hope for it to succeed as well. Innovation (of any kind) pushes the industry forward. When people oppose innovation for whatever reason, it always reminds me of Henry Ford's famous quote: "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses."
Are you one of those with a raging hateboner towards everything immutable? I ask this as I don't see any reason to bring this up in the first place.
I meant that I support this distro as long as it's not immutable because I'm an opponent of immutability on the desktop. If they're also making other kinds of systems, immutability may be beneficial there.
When people oppose innovation for whatever reason, it always reminds me of Henry Ford's famous quote: "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses."
Sometimes innovation is bad or rushed (such as removal of X11 on Fedora). Often only people with the newest hardware can benefit from it anyways. They don't care about regular users making the products worse for them which is basically egoism. There is a reason for proprietary products having legacy support after all.